April Championship and NAC

Div I Women's Foil

Monday, April 15, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 WEINTRAUB Maia M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 42%
2 BLOW Iman (Mani) A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 50%
3 BINDER Sylvie A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 68%
3 ELIZONDO Isabelle M. 100% 100% 100% 97% 86% 56% 19%
5 ZEISS Madison E. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 25%
6 HE Elizabeth W. 100% 99% 93% 71% 35% 8%
7 MINARIK Natalie M. 100% 99% 88% 60% 26% 6% -
8 RHODES Zander 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 26%
9 KOO Haley B. 100% 100% 98% 90% 67% 33% 7%
10 CRUM Quinn T. 100% 98% 87% 59% 26% 6% -
11 ABAYEVA Sasha 100% 93% 66% 30% 8% 1% -
12 ZHANG Rachel 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 17%
13 NOTT Adrienne (Adi) M. 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 33% 7%
14 LEE Annora Y. 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 35% 8%
15 KNIGHT Skylar 100% 99% 95% 78% 46% 16% 2%
16 APELIAN Katherine 100% 97% 80% 46% 16% 3% -
17 YAROSHENKO Karina 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 37% 9%
18 STAMOS Maria 100% 99% 94% 73% 38% 9% 1%
19 NISHIMURA Madeleine A. 100% 95% 75% 40% 12% 1%
20 LO Ashley 100% 99% 94% 75% 43% 14% 2%
21 TIEU May L. 100% 100% 99% 95% 77% 43% 11%
22 PARTRIDGE Morgan K. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 59% 20%
23 GONG Christina S. 100% 86% 52% 19% 4% - -
24 CHOI Lenna K. 100% 96% 78% 45% 16% 3% -
25 HAO Alicia 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 34%
26 TAN Elisha 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 33% 4%
27 GOMES Rafaella T. 100% 60% 19% 3% - - -
28 LEE Yejine 100% 100% 96% 78% 45% 15% 2%
29 FREEDMAN Miranda W. 100% 97% 81% 49% 18% 3% -
30 WANG Karina (Karina Xue Wang) X. 100% 99% 92% 69% 36% 10% 1%
31 SHALANSKY Julia B. 100% 76% 36% 10% 2% - -
32 KOKES Gabrielle 100% 94% 71% 38% 12% 2% -
33 TAN Helen 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 11%
34 CHENG Evelyn 100% 99% 91% 68% 34% 9% 1%
35 LI Grace Q. 100% 97% 82% 52% 20% 4% -
36 ADLER Polly Z. 100% 99% 94% 72% 37% 11% 1%
37 FERRARI Christina M. 100% 100% 99% 89% 62% 26% 4%
38 CHEN Alyssa J. 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 35% 8%
39 HOOSHI Erica S. 100% 97% 80% 48% 18% 4% -
40 CROMPTON Celia N. 100% 99% 92% 68% 33% 8% 1%
41 LAM Justina 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 20%
42 CHO Sabrina N. 100% 99% 89% 62% 26% 5%
43 KOO Rachel A. 100% 97% 80% 48% 17% 2%
44 HORSLEY Asherah 100% 100% 99% 91% 67% 32% 7%
45 MANDOUR Sophia M. 100% 94% 72% 38% 12% 2% -
46 ZAROFF Roxanne 100% 99% 88% 59% 25% 6% 1%
47 KIM Rachael 100% 89% 57% 22% 4% - -
48 LUONG Paige K. 100% 99% 94% 76% 44% 15% 2%
49 HUNT Tarleton Q. 100% 99% 88% 59% 25% 5% -
50 PARK Rowan M. 100% 95% 71% 34% 9% 1% -
50 HUNG Juliana K. 100% 100% 95% 77% 45% 15% 2%
52 MARTOS Sara A. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 20%
53 THOMPSON Julia T. 100% 97% 80% 47% 16% 2%
54 JING Alexandra 100% 97% 83% 51% 19% 3%
55 QIAN Crystal 100% 97% 80% 45% 14% 2%
56 BIASCO Anna 100% 99% 90% 66% 33% 9% 1%
57 LEE Allison (Allie) 100% 100% 94% 75% 42% 12% 1%
58 BANIN Isabelle J. 100% 95% 74% 40% 13% 2% -
59 ZHOU Emme 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 32% 5%
60 CHUSID Renata (Renata Chusid) M. 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 7%
61 SHEN Jasmine N. 100% 96% 78% 46% 17% 4% -
62 BREKER Anika 100% 96% 75% 39% 12% 2% -
63 JIA Amy 100% 88% 56% 22% 5% -
64 FLANAGAN Catherine H. 100% 97% 77% 42% 12% 2%
65 LAU Sydnee M. 100% 97% 79% 45% 15% 2% -
66 SEAL Julie T. 100% 98% 84% 53% 21% 4% -
67 LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) 100% 63% 22% 4% - -
68 YANKOVSKIY Anastasia 100% 99% 91% 68% 35% 10% 1%
69 REN Olivia Y. 100% 97% 82% 51% 20% 4% -
70 MAROTTA Veronica L. 100% 87% 53% 20% 4% - -
71 CHON Samantha 100% 88% 57% 24% 6% 1% -
72 YU Seneca 100% 77% 38% 10% 2% - -
73 TANG Louise 100% 99% 91% 65% 29% 6% -
74 LEE Alina 100% 97% 84% 54% 23% 5% -
75 ALFONSO Czarina M. 100% 95% 73% 38% 12% 2% -
76 MOLHO Sofia 100% 88% 57% 23% 5% 1% -
77 MERGES Gretl C. 100% 58% 18% 3% - - -
78 LEVI Lea 100% 92% 65% 30% 8% 1% -
79 BHANOT Gayatri 100% 81% 42% 12% 2% - -
80 SHEN Sophia H. 100% 94% 67% 30% 8% 1% -
81 SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. 100% 76% 36% 10% 1% - -
82 SERBAN Samantha M. 100% 96% 74% 38% 11% 2% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.