COZMX Fencing ROC/RJCC/RYC

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Sunday, November 3, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

San Joaquin County Fairgrounds - Stockton, CA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2278 2432 - 2148
5 - 8 2078 2111 - 2004
9 - 16 1830 1990 - 1651
17 - 24 1803 2500 - 1447

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kettelle, John Massialas Foundation (M Team) C24 2432 2147.51
2 Wu, Lucas Bay Area Fencing Club C23 2270 2015.83
3 Rodriguez, Tyler Massialas Foundation (M Team) C24 2262 2007.41
4 Lam, Nicolas Bay Area Fencing Club D23 2148 1876.72
5 Zhou, Ryan Silicon Valley Fencing Center C24 2111 1846.86
6 Park, William Massialas Foundation (M Team) E24 2099 1839.32
7 Gordon, William Bay Area Fencing Club C24 2099 1836.96
8 Ong, Nicholas Elite International Fencers Club E24 2004 1738.98
9 Chan, Joseph Massialas Foundation (M Team) E24 1977 1696.79
10 Tuan, Evan Golden State Fencing Academy D22 1990 1680.78
11 Yue, Jackson Silicon Valley Fencing Center D24 1900 1636.99
12 Zhan, Kevin Golubitsky Fencing Center E24 1871 1537.32
13 Wei, Winston Massialas Foundation (M Team) E24 1800 1509.47
14 Greenebaum, Oliver Piedmont Fencing Team D24 1754 1429.31
15 Peterson, Lucas West Berkeley Fencing Club D24 1696 1386.47
16 Wong, Braxton Massialas Foundation (M Team) E24 1651 1275.16
17 Andrade, Cedric Bay Area Fencing Club E24 1625 1235.11
18 Silveira, Jorgen Von Prime Fencing Academy U 2436 1190.46
19 Zhang, Andrew Bay Area Fencing Club U 1576 1156.95
20 He, Bourne Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1447 1110.89
21 RAFFERTY-FUENTES, Patrick Golden State Fencing Academy E24 1601 1078.49
22 Kulkarni, Karan Prime Fencing Academy E24 1550 872.67
23 Williams, Matthew Prime Fencing Academy U 1692 857.00
24 Devineni, Avyang Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 2500 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!