Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PRILUTSKY Stan | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
2 | LUNDBORG Mark R. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
3 | BUSH Joshua C. | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 61% | |
3 | DASHNAW Stephen | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
5 | MATT Chris | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% | |
6 | CHU Kevin | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
7 | ZIPPER Michael E. | 1% | 16% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
8 | WILDMAN Steve | 4% | 34% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | |
9 | BACON Michael F. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
10 | GUEBLE Jeffrey R. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% | |
11 | MAURI Gherardo | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 2% |
12 | TSUNG David | 14% | 37% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | |
13 | KASTOR Jacaeber | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
14 | MIGHELL Jason | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
15 | JAKUBEK Zygmunt J. | - | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
16 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
17 | MALDARI Frank | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
18 | ESCUETA Jr Antonio V. | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
19 | BAKER Keith L. | 1% | 11% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 1% | |
20 | SRERE Mark A. | 4% | 34% | 42% | 17% | 2% | - | |
21 | KEEFER Philip E. | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
22 | KRASNICH Mike | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
23 | DAHL Chris | 1% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
24 | YUNG Wang Y. | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 8% | |
25 | HICHA Paul R. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
26 | DANIELL Steven J. | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
27 | YOWELL Kevin G. | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
28 | THORNTON Michael (Mike) G. | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
28 | SHERRARD Kael G. | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
30 | SHORT Skip | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
31 | SEGALE William J. | 43% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.