Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DEMING Clare L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 5% | |
| 2 | BERMAN Frauke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% |
| 3 | JOHNSON Laura S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
| 3 | ENOCHS Liz | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
| 5 | KING Robin E. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 6 | DENNER Jasmina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 1% |
| 7 | EYRE Jane E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 8 | FOLEY Eileen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 9 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 10 | VANCE Beth S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 11 | GLUCK Myriam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 12 | GRAJALES Emily K. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 13 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 14 | DREYER Nadia S. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 15 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | LAPP Laurie E. | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | ALTMAN Leigh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% | 16% | |
| 18 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 19 | JERKINS Jayne A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 2% | |
| 20 | LORANG Kim L. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
| 21 | DUNN Linda J. J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | |
| 22 | OFFERLE Judith (Jude) A. | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 23 | KIM Nam Heui | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 8% | - | |
| 24 | VILLYARD Cynthia (Cy) A. | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 25 | WALTER Joanne | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | YANG Jenny J. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | KNUTSON Theresa S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 28 | DAHL Naomi V. | 100% | 98% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 29 | DEGEN Anita L. | 100% | 84% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | HANAMOTO Claire M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | HURST Susan E. | 100% | 88% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | DUDLEY Gayle | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.