NJFA Fall Classic RYC & Non-Regional Junior and D1A

Youth 10 Women’s Saber (Y10WS)

Sunday, November 24, 2024 at 9:00 AM

Register

Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2010 2047 - 1961
5 - 8 1758 1823 - 1668
9 - 16 1554 1693 - 1382
17 - 25 1173 1438 - 711

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Maluki, Nia Tim Morehouse Fencing Club E24 2047 1769.91
2 Menon, Maya Fencing Academy Of Boston U 2041 1744.41
3 Lamtan, Trinity Manhattan Fencing Center U 1992 1702.03
4 Kong, Hermione Manhattan Fencing Center U 1961 1591.02
5 Chen, Chloe Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1816 1554.99
6 Tsiporukha, Arie Manhattan Fencing Center U 1823 1533.20
7 Kabiling, Anika Von Marie Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1726 1457.48
8 Ong, Katherine Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1668 1366.85
9 Konde, Anika Cobra Fencing Club LLC U 1655 1315.72
10 Gao, Anita Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 1655 1290.50
11 Tomonari, Akari Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1693 1289.17
12 Chang, Grace Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1529 1238.18
13 Hong, Eden Manhattan Fencing Center U 1583 1025.39
14 Wu, Jing Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy U 1382 1008.49
15 Chang, Daisy Yijin Boston Fencing Club U 1541 939.10
16 Alperovich, Madeline Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Connecticut) U 1395 878.75
17 Sarbu, Esme Integrity Fencing Studio U 1241 842.83
18 Lee, Kady Hayen Brooklyn Bridge Fencing Club U 1270 703.92
19 Liu, Alyssa U 1280 568.16
20 Potdar, Harper Zeta Fencing U 1144 509.64
21 Dy, Azurie Excel Fencing Academy U 1046 423.44
22 Palacios, Sophia Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1438 368.45
23 Bhardwaj, Sara Cobra Fencing Club LLC U 1032 219.76
24 Dlugy, Daniella Unattached U 1394 < 0
25 Yang, Rachel Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy U 711 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!