NJFA Fall Classic RYC & Non-Regional Junior and D1A

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Sunday, November 24, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2155 2434 - 1881
5 - 8 1830 1921 - 1764
9 - 16 1679 1918 - 1430
17 - 26 1506 2500 - 798

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Aluf, William Manhattan Fencing Center U 2434 2039.06
2 Hu, Simon Long Island Fencing Center U 2197 1913.19
3 Wang, Russell Long Island Fencing Center U 2109 1787.33
4 Mangini, Lorenzo Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1881 1491.62
5 Sabino, Bennett Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1764 1425.52
6 Ip, Hunter Manhattan Fencing Center U 1921 1409.21
7 Lee, Aiden Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1806 1387.20
8 Constantine, Leonidas Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1831 1243.90
9 Motov, Max Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1918 1207.57
10 Krishnarasa, Aiyann Integrity Fencing Studio U 1699 1068.42
11 Brooks, Grant Olympian Fencing Studio U 1528 1014.64
12 Knobel, Benjamin Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1772 999.56
13 Zhang, Mark Manhattan Fencing Center U 1430 981.88
14 Zhang, Ethan Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 1545 908.07
15 Kim, Colin Long Island Fencing Center U 1877 900.14
16 Robles, Rafael Advance Fencing And Fitness Academy U 1663 840.58
17 Chen, Ryan Long Island Fencing Center U 1708 787.27
18 Fernaine, Thomas Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1351 579.29
19 Vincent, Yian Brooklyn Bridge Fencing Club U 2000 472.80
20 Gentela, Pradyumna Aura Fencing Academy U 1569 332.25
21 Zhang, Hanzhi The Fencing Center U 798 290.50
22 Xu, Jayden Excel Fencing Academy U 1349 229.97
23 Palermo, Evan Hills Fencing Institute U 2500 < 0
24 Fung, Emerson Cobra Fencing Club LLC U 1389 < 0
25 Haglund, James Long Island Fencers Club U 1388 < 0
26 Huang, Max Bergen Fencing Club U 1006 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!