Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Paulina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% | |
| 2 | TAIRA Aya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 3 | RENTON Samantha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% |
| 3 | SIMPSON Lydia Q. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 5 | FELLMAN Sara | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 6 | PAGES Melanie | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 7 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | |
| 8 | KIM Alyssa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 20% | |
| 9 | POWERS Kathryn | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 10 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 6% | |
| 10 | LUU Shanon K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
| 12 | VOHRA Anusha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 11% | |
| 13 | THOMAS Aaria S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 14 | COKER Bettina M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 18% |
| 15 | OESTERREICHER Chloe K. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 32% | 5% | - | |
| 16 | TRASKUNOV Alisa G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 17 | FOLLOWILL Sarah S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 18 | GROGAN Hunter K. | 100% | 88% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | WANG Catherine K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 20 | WANG Yiran (Cindy) | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 21 | KANG Jiyoon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 22 | HAZEL Susan L. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | SANDAU Ella | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 24 | JACKSON Wilma S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | 4% | |
| 25 | BOLES Sophia | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | DE LA FOSCADE-CONDON Celine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 26% | 3% | |
| 27 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | YE Catherine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 29 | VELAZQUEZ Rosa T. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 30 | CRANDALL Kelly | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | WOODFORD Kalei E. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | BRUNELLI Alessandra | 100% | 95% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | PRESTWICH Paula J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 34 | RAYNER Rylie G. | 100% | 90% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | LIPPAI Sarah | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | SOBISKY Kari | 100% | 83% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | FRAY-WITZER Ava | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.