NJFA Fall Classic RYC & Non-Regional Junior and D1A

Youth 14 Women’s Saber (Y14WS)

Sunday, November 24, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1843 2077 - 1682
5 - 8 1840 2125 - 1701
9 - 16 1458 1592 - 1276
17 - 26 1216 2500 - 816

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Castelo, Soleil Cobra Fencing Club LLC C24 2077 1820.77
2 Bandhu, Saahiti Escrimeur Fencers Club U 1831 1472.11
3 Huang, Pierra Manhattan Fencing Center D24 1783 1451.57
4 Lee, Kaitlin Aura Fencing Academy E24 1682 1412.70
5 Lee, Grace Manhattan Fencing Center U 1795 1405.44
6 Zhao, Selena Bergen Fencing Club E24 1738 1389.65
7 Zhang, Audrey Aura Fencing Academy U 1701 1303.72
8 Cafagna, Sofia Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 2125 1274.84
9 Wong, Charlene Aura Fencing Academy E24 1530 1255.32
10 Leigh, Adalene Olympian Fencing Studio U 1551 1204.92
11 Wang, Keira Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1414 1056.53
12 Desautels, Alexandra Candlewood Fencing Center E24 1405 1022.20
13 Margulis, Roxana Manhattan Fencing Center U 1506 963.64
14 Merzlyakova, Maria Manhattan Fencing Center U 1592 921.32
15 Golen, Grace Manhattan Fencing Center U 1387 866.48
16 Saxena, Devina Shyamli New Jersey Fencing Alliance U 1276 685.40
17 Lee, Jiyoung Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1848 644.37
18 Converso-Parsons, Maia Fencing Academy Of Philadelphia - North U 995 579.75
19 Shi, Chuqing Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1257 518.13
20 Buccino, Sloane Durkan Fencing Academy U 1043 304.69
21 Liao, Amber Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 869 171.76
22 Dibadj, Ava Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 874 74.96
23 Liu, Teresa U 2500 < 0
24 Merzlyakova, Alexandra Manhattan Fencing Center U 816 < 0
25 Parker, Mrinali Boston Fencing Club U 1077 < 0
26 Maddison, Erica Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 883 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!