Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
2 | REID Sobia | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 29% | 9% |
3 | RECKLING Kathleen A. | - | - | 4% | 29% | 47% | 20% | |
3 | GIFFORD Emily R. | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% | |
5 | CHAN Cheri K. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 41% |
6 | LEANG Andrea K. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
7 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
8 | BEI Karen | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% | |
9 | RUSSELL Renata | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
10 | RASMUSSEN Ashelee | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
11 | SCHMUGAR Brooke | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
12 | LEE Olive | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
13 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 43% | 47% | |
14 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
15 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
16 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
17 | BARNES Olivia R. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
18 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
19 | YOUNG Ashley | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
20 | GLOVER Cynthia E. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
21 | GERARDIN Marie | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
22 | BELSLEY Devon K. | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
23 | DING Sandra | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
24 | WEBER Nora | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
25 | FENG Kelly L. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
26 | ZHANG Maya | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 35% | 6% | |
27 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
28 | SON Katherine (Injee) | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
29 | O'REILLY Aeryn E. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
30 | BOWIE Charlotta | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
31 | MAO Amy | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
32 | NICOU Nicole | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
33 | LI AnnieSiliang | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
34 | GROENING Joanne | 2% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
35 | HUTCHINSON Valerie A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
36 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 1% | 15% | 41% | 36% | 6% | - | |
37 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
38 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
39 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | 1% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
40 | JI Catherine | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
41 | DUAN Jenny S. | 2% | 36% | 40% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
42 | BYRON Karen J. | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
43 | FREY Alison | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
44 | YOUNG Kaitlin | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
45 | GREGSTON Lailia B. | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
46 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 15% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
47 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - | |
48 | PARTE Isabella B. | 5% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
49 | ZHANG Rachel | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 2% | |
50 | CHEN Jephanie Y. | 14% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
51 | WOLF Lisa A. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
52 | DU Yiyun (Doreen) | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
53 | MILLER Veronica | 3% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
54 | HUANG audrey | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
55 | LI Tiffany | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
56 | IVANOVA Olga | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
57 | RYAN Minhuey | - | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
58 | ESTRADA Anna G. | 15% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
59 | OGANESIAN Alice N. | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
60 | DRONAMRAJU Navya | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
61 | RIOS Donna B. | 58% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
62 | CAMERON Maya | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
63 | ROWLAND May | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
64 | MCGARY Amy | 43% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
65 | DEVLIN Wilhelmina | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
66 | CHRISTIAN Lyn T. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
67 | SIMARD Sherrol A. | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.