Phoenix Fencing Academy - Tempe, AZ, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ROBERTS Sam | V V V V V | V V V V | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 2 | NOBLE Daniel | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | HJERPE Wade | V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | QIU Nathan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 5 | BURR Tanner | V D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 6 | WONG James T. | V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 7 | BOLTON Dawson E. | D V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 8 | PEDRAZA Regina | D V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 9 | HWANG Gabi M. | V V D D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 10 | RADY-PENTEK Charles | V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 11 | REBELLO Derek | V V V D D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 12 | HICHA Paul R. | V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 13 | FREY Sarah | D D V D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 14 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | D D V V D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 15 | LABRECQUE Savannah | D D D D D | V D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 16 | JOHNSON Kai | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 17 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 18 | WILSON Eva | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 19 | HETTIWATTE Yehansa | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.