Nittany Lion Cup ROC/RJCC/RYC

Youth 12 Men’s Foil (Y12MF)

Sunday, January 12, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Nittany Valley Sports Centre - State College, PA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2086 2375 - 1746
5 - 8 1696 1737 - 1612
9 - 16 1483 1733 - 1329
17 - 27 1046 1453 - 738

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wang, Mendy Future Stars Fencing U 2375 2116.44
2 Chang, Parker Fencers Club Inc. D24 2229 1975.17
3 Kingsley, Griffin Top Fencing Club U 1994 1740.35
4 Ulysse, Jacob Candlewood Fencing Center U 1746 1492.35
5 Choi, Hunter Top Fencing Club U 1727 1472.07
6 Cao, Joshua V Fencing Club E24 1707 1455.89
7 Levkovich, Avery Freehold Fencing Academy U 1737 1417.07
8 Sharma, Ari Top Fencing Club U 1612 1351.91
9 Cohen, Benjamin Fencing Academy Of Philadelphia - University City U 1733 1336.30
10 Tarchichi, Daniel Pittsburgh Fencers Club U 1618 1290.58
11 Shen, Lucas Worldwide Fencing Academy U 1505 1235.73
12 Keegan, Cole Way Of The Sword.Org U 1542 1220.58
13 Converso-Parsons, Alexander Fencing Academy Of Philadelphia - North U 1406 1132.64
14 Mondesir, Chace PISTE Fencing Academy U 1364 1056.96
15 Wu, David Rochester Fencing Club U 1366 973.39
16 Yin, Andrew Star Fencing Academy U 1329 870.82
17 Cordero, Javier Rochester Fencing Club U 1295 782.09
18 Davidson, Henry Way Of The Sword.Org U 1077 635.14
19 saleh, yassin Rochester Fencing Club U 1290 550.84
20 Zhao, Ethan Brooklyn Fencing Center U 1076 497.91
21 Juvvadi, Pratham Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA U 1047 407.71
22 Snyder, Winston Fencing Academy of Philadelphia - Main Line U 934 264.49
23 Mack, Julian OnTarget Fencing Club U 812 246.28
24 Murphy-Mims, Connor Royal Fencing Academy U 935 < 0
25 Bubnis, Declan Fates Fencing Academy U 738 < 0
26 Zhu, Henry Tiger Fencing Club U 1453 < 0
27 Ringwelski, Anthony Fates Fencing Academy U 853 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!