2024 Bull City Y8 RYC/RJC Tournament

Junior Women’s Saber (JNRWS)

Saturday, September 28, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Leroy T. Walker Physical Education and Recreation Complex/ North Carolina Central University - Durham, NC

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2528 2710 - 2391
5 - 8 2248 2373 - 2053
9 - 16 1738 1994 - 1329
17 - 25 1093 1387 - 568

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Pantaleon-Mazola, Amari Nellya Fencers B24 2710 2454.51
2 Dhar, Layla Capital Fencing Academy B24 2512 2260.17
3 HSU, Leah Nellya Fencers B23 2497 2243.56
4 Dhar, Rana Capital Fencing Academy E24 2391 2134.88
5 Fan, Alexandria Miracle Fencing Club C24 2373 2117.69
6 Xu, Emily Miracle Fencing Club C23 2332 2074.96
7 Xie, Nora Forge Fencing Teams DUR B24 2236 1978.99
8 Johnson, Neema Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 2053 1775.55
9 Nadkarni, Marisa Capital Fencing Academy E24 1994 1730.28
10 Chi, Claire Capital Fencing Academy D24 1971 1715.54
11 Ellis-Furlong, Ava Forge Fencing Teams DUR D23 1933 1641.03
12 Wunnava, Ellora Forge Fencing Teams DUR D24 1883 1580.16
13 Ming, Emma Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1748 1443.96
14 Fleeger, Sophia Miracle Fencing Club E24 1516 1225.88
15 Mueller, Sarah Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1530 1112.94
16 Wilfret, Katerina Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1329 1027.48
17 Coovadia, Malina Forge Fencing Teams DUR E24 1387 1023.50
18 Gerasimova, Valeria Research Triangle Fencing E24 1315 861.19
19 Fang, Darcy Miracle Fencing Club U 1274 857.19
20 Fang, Elena Miracle Fencing Club U 1184 753.05
21 Johnson, Marlee Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1253 688.59
22 Bhaskara, Srita Pratika Alpha Fencing Academy U 1254 649.38
23 Bhaskara, Srikriti Alpha Fencing Academy U 948 < 0
24 McShane, Adele Research Triangle Fencing U 658 < 0
25 Reynolds Chang, Anna Capital Fencing Academy U 568 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!