2024 Bull City Y8 RYC/RJC Tournament

Junior Women’s Saber (JNRWS)

Saturday, September 28, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Leroy T. Walker Physical Education and Recreation Complex/ North Carolina Central University - Durham, NC

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2501 2646 - 2370
5 - 8 2215 2319 - 2070
9 - 16 1739 2016 - 1387
17 - 25 1089 1348 - 568

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Pantaleon-Mazola, Amari Nellya Fencers B24 2646 2393.60
2 HSU, Leah Nellya Fencers B23 2505 2250.16
3 Dhar, Layla Capital Fencing Academy B24 2482 2229.46
4 Fan, Alexandria Miracle Fencing Club C24 2370 2111.78
5 Xu, Emily Miracle Fencing Club C23 2319 2063.62
6 Xie, Nora Forge Fencing Teams DUR B24 2241 1983.73
7 Dhar, Rana Capital Fencing Academy E24 2231 1970.02
8 Johnson, Neema Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 2070 1791.25
9 Nadkarni, Marisa Capital Fencing Academy E24 2016 1749.59
10 Chi, Claire Capital Fencing Academy D24 1971 1715.54
11 Ellis-Furlong, Ava Forge Fencing Teams DUR D23 1911 1605.83
12 Wunnava, Ellora Forge Fencing Teams DUR D24 1883 1580.16
13 Ming, Emma Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1706 1384.24
14 Fleeger, Sophia Miracle Fencing Club E24 1507 1210.36
15 Mueller, Sarah Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1530 1112.94
16 Coovadia, Malina Forge Fencing Teams DUR E24 1387 1023.50
17 Wilfret, Katerina Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1296 986.39
18 Fang, Darcy Miracle Fencing Club U 1348 896.28
19 Gerasimova, Valeria Research Triangle Fencing E24 1315 861.19
20 Bhaskara, Srita Pratika Alpha Fencing Academy U 1298 666.93
21 Fang, Elena Miracle Fencing Club U 1153 622.84
22 Johnson, Marlee Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1214 621.44
23 Bhaskara, Srikriti Alpha Fencing Academy U 948 < 0
24 McShane, Adele Research Triangle Fencing U 658 < 0
25 Reynolds Chang, Anna Capital Fencing Academy U 568 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!