2024 Bull City Y8 RYC/RJC Tournament

Junior Women’s Saber (JNRWS)

Saturday, September 28, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Leroy T. Walker Physical Education and Recreation Complex/ North Carolina Central University - Durham, NC

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2435 2484 - 2378
5 - 8 2084 2253 - 1834
9 - 16 1589 1837 - 1302
17 - 25 1487 2500 - 1135

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Dhar, Layla Capital Fencing Academy B24 2484 2221.64
2 Pantaleon-Mazola, Amari Nellya Fencers B24 2458 2205.69
3 HSU, Leah Nellya Fencers B23 2419 2158.48
4 Xu, Emily Miracle Fencing Club C23 2378 2117.77
5 Fan, Alexandria Miracle Fencing Club C24 2253 1973.55
6 Xie, Nora Forge Fencing Teams DUR B24 2236 1960.13
7 Dhar, Rana Capital Fencing Academy E24 2013 1713.65
8 Chi, Claire Capital Fencing Academy D24 1834 1559.84
9 Wunnava, Ellora Forge Fencing Teams DUR D24 1837 1517.08
10 Nadkarni, Marisa Capital Fencing Academy E24 1814 1497.03
11 Ellis-Furlong, Ava Forge Fencing Teams DUR D23 1717 1349.21
12 Fleeger, Sophia Miracle Fencing Club E24 1517 1155.16
13 Ming, Emma Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1640 1120.09
14 Coovadia, Malina Forge Fencing Teams DUR E24 1440 954.15
15 Mueller, Sarah Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1445 928.29
16 Wilfret, Katerina Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1302 865.04
17 Gerasimova, Valeria Research Triangle Fencing E24 1218 696.10
18 Fang, Darcy Miracle Fencing Club U 1502 626.46
19 Johnson, Neema Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1623 476.56
20 Fang, Elena Miracle Fencing Club U 1317 428.81
21 Johnson, Marlee Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1216 57.20
22 Reynolds Chang, Anna Capital Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
23 Bhaskara, Srikriti Alpha Fencing Academy U 1456 < 0
24 Bhaskara, Srita Pratika Alpha Fencing Academy U 1415 < 0
25 McShane, Adele Research Triangle Fencing U 1135 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!