2024 Bull City Y8 RYC/RJC Tournament

Junior Women’s Saber (JNRWS)

Saturday, September 28, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Leroy T. Walker Physical Education and Recreation Complex/ North Carolina Central University - Durham, NC

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2496 2657 - 2358
5 - 8 2226 2319 - 2070
9 - 16 1739 1988 - 1387
17 - 25 1085 1325 - 568

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Pantaleon-Mazola, Amari Nellya Fencers B24 2657 2401.69
2 HSU, Leah Nellya Fencers B23 2485 2231.17
3 Dhar, Layla Capital Fencing Academy B24 2482 2228.69
4 Fan, Alexandria Miracle Fencing Club C24 2358 2100.30
5 Xu, Emily Miracle Fencing Club C23 2319 2063.62
6 Dhar, Rana Capital Fencing Academy E24 2273 2013.53
7 Xie, Nora Forge Fencing Teams DUR B24 2241 1983.73
8 Johnson, Neema Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 2070 1791.25
9 Nadkarni, Marisa Capital Fencing Academy E24 1988 1724.00
10 Chi, Claire Capital Fencing Academy D24 1971 1715.54
11 Ellis-Furlong, Ava Forge Fencing Teams DUR D23 1941 1643.85
12 Wunnava, Ellora Forge Fencing Teams DUR D24 1883 1580.16
13 Ming, Emma Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1689 1373.35
14 Fleeger, Sophia Miracle Fencing Club E24 1522 1228.53
15 Mueller, Sarah Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1530 1112.94
16 Coovadia, Malina Forge Fencing Teams DUR E24 1387 1023.50
17 Wilfret, Katerina Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1314 1006.78
18 Fang, Darcy Miracle Fencing Club U 1325 883.02
19 Gerasimova, Valeria Research Triangle Fencing E24 1315 861.19
20 Johnson, Marlee Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1253 688.59
21 Bhaskara, Srita Pratika Alpha Fencing Academy U 1254 649.38
22 Fang, Elena Miracle Fencing Club U 1128 609.95
23 Bhaskara, Srikriti Alpha Fencing Academy U 948 < 0
24 McShane, Adele Research Triangle Fencing U 658 < 0
25 Reynolds Chang, Anna Capital Fencing Academy U 568 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!