2024 Bull City Y8 RYC/RJC Tournament

Junior Women’s Saber (JNRWS)

Saturday, September 28, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Leroy T. Walker Physical Education and Recreation Complex/ North Carolina Central University - Durham, NC

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2492 2634 - 2319
5 - 8 2222 2319 - 2070
9 - 16 1730 1975 - 1425
17 - 25 1102 1387 - 568

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Pantaleon-Mazola, Amari Nellya Fencers B24 2634 2381.95
2 HSU, Leah Nellya Fencers B23 2517 2260.53
3 Dhar, Layla Capital Fencing Academy B24 2496 2240.99
4 Xu, Emily Miracle Fencing Club C23 2319 2063.62
5 Fan, Alexandria Miracle Fencing Club C24 2319 2060.38
6 Xie, Nora Forge Fencing Teams DUR B24 2257 1998.36
7 Dhar, Rana Capital Fencing Academy E24 2240 1976.57
8 Johnson, Neema Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 2070 1791.25
9 Nadkarni, Marisa Capital Fencing Academy E24 1975 1704.70
10 Chi, Claire Capital Fencing Academy D24 1943 1686.18
11 Ellis-Furlong, Ava Forge Fencing Teams DUR D23 1922 1614.85
12 Wunnava, Ellora Forge Fencing Teams DUR D24 1883 1580.16
13 Ming, Emma Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1678 1319.68
14 Fleeger, Sophia Miracle Fencing Club E24 1488 1187.14
15 Mueller, Sarah Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1530 1112.94
16 Coovadia, Malina Forge Fencing Teams DUR E24 1425 1054.98
17 Wilfret, Katerina Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1334 1004.57
18 Fang, Darcy Miracle Fencing Club U 1387 921.35
19 Gerasimova, Valeria Research Triangle Fencing E24 1315 861.19
20 Johnson, Marlee Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1284 612.70
21 Fang, Elena Miracle Fencing Club U 1109 524.20
22 Bhaskara, Srita Pratika Alpha Fencing Academy U 1238 462.26
23 Bhaskara, Srikriti Alpha Fencing Academy U 1023 < 0
24 McShane, Adele Research Triangle Fencing U 658 < 0
25 Reynolds Chang, Anna Capital Fencing Academy U 568 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!