2024 Bull City Y8 RYC/RJC Tournament

Junior Men’s Saber (JNRMS)

Saturday, September 28, 2024 at 10:00 AM

Register

Leroy T. Walker Physical Education and Recreation Complex/ North Carolina Central University - Durham, NC

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2556 2941 - 2294
5 - 8 2222 2254 - 2160
9 - 16 2044 2287 - 1915
17 - 26 1562 1934 - 940

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Deck, Tyson Forge Fencing Teams DUR B24 2550 2296.52
2 Elbakry, Ahmed U 2941 2098.15
3 Huchwajda, Alex Research Triangle Fencing E24 2438 2086.91
4 Henry, Cadel Forge Fencing Teams DUR D24 2294 2031.17
5 Rinaldi, Savio Capital Fencing Academy E24 2254 2002.16
6 Crain, Bennett Forge Fencing Teams DUR D24 2248 1978.46
7 Balu, Aedan Research Triangle Fencing U 2227 1953.78
8 Feng, Brendan Miracle Fencing Club E23 2160 1906.67
9 Shim, Tristan Forge Fencing Teams DUR D24 2287 1882.55
10 Hu, Harry Nellya Fencers E23 2083 1824.12
11 Xu, Ivan Miracle Fencing Club C24 2025 1761.26
12 Liu, Ethan Nellya Fencers E24 2053 1756.42
13 qin, toby Research Triangle Fencing U 2063 1715.85
14 Yang, Justin Alpha Fencing Academy U 1985 1711.00
15 Benson, Jacob Nova Fencing Club E24 1915 1590.09
16 Eyster, Edison Forge Fencing Teams DUR D24 1938 1571.39
17 Kurilo, Michael Alpha Fencing Academy E24 1881 1548.80
18 Bialik, Noah Triple Threat Fencing Academy E23 1895 1548.46
19 Slep, Solomon Forge Fencing Teams DUR E24 1934 1543.60
20 Fruth, Evan Forge Fencing Teams DUR E23 1759 1429.89
21 Padanilam, Thomas Nellya Fencers U 1691 1293.41
22 Bramlett, Myer Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1511 1195.78
23 Mehta, Yash Research Triangle Fencing U 1568 897.23
24 Xu, Princeton Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 1303 617.03
25 Sackman, Bodhisattva North Florida Fencing Club U 1134 528.05
26 Webb, Lane Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 940 50.97

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!