2024 Bull City Y8 RYC/RJC Tournament

Youth 12 Men’s Foil (Y12MF)

Sunday, September 29, 2024 at 3:00 PM

Register

Leroy T. Walker Physical Education and Recreation Complex/ North Carolina Central University - Durham, NC

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2329 2781 - 2049
5 - 8 1943 2371 - 1625
9 - 16 1345 1693 - 1093
17 - 23 1817 2500 - 851

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Hollander, Max Apex Fencing Academy U 2781 1975.52
2 Zeng, Alex Research Triangle Fencing U 2356 1938.31
3 LIM, EUNSEONG Auburn Fencing Club D24 2129 1865.36
4 Huynh, Matthew Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. E24 2049 1796.42
5 Pan, Ethan Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. D24 2033 1774.83
6 Zeng, Albert Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 1744 1463.17
7 Greenwald, Silas Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 2371 1411.70
8 Omohundro, Lane Auburn Fencing Club U 1625 1121.33
9 Huynh, Kaleb Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 1337 1029.04
10 Nemi, Vin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1432 986.46
11 Hoffman, Zane Epic Fencing Club U 1438 943.17
12 Kutateladze, Danieli Epic Fencing Club U 1174 546.52
13 Morrison, Archer Salle D'Armes Bosco U 1693 530.84
14 Kubba, Krish Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 1093 462.03
15 Chu, Joe Epic Fencing Club U 1477 396.40
16 Griffin, Andrew Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 1118 344.41
17 Choe, Austin Williamson County Fencing Club U 1012 274.81
18 Robertson, Liam Birmingham Fencing Club U 855 149.49
19 Reynolds Chang, Luke Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 851 20.64
20 Gayer, Mace Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 2500 < 0
21 Lang, Hongxu Epic Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
22 McGahan, Clayton U 2500 < 0
23 Saha, Rohan Apex Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!