WFencing Cleveland Rocks RYC/RJCC

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, November 2, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Woodling Gymnasium - Cleveland State University - Cleveland, OH

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2287 2459 - 2169
5 - 8 2129 2190 - 2083
9 - 16 1807 2025 - 1615
17 - 24 1401 1956 - 850

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Zheng, Marcus Renaissance Fencing Club C24 2459 2205.28
2 Lu, Alex Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy C24 2346 2090.89
3 Fang, Haoyu Renaissance Fencing Club E24 2173 1920.36
4 Copeland, Nigel Cyranos Place C24 2169 1881.24
5 Arata, Connor RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D24 2190 1875.32
6 kennedy, christo Pittsburgh Fencers Club D24 2136 1866.74
7 Toews, Jackson Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club D24 2108 1831.03
8 Sun, Henry Pittsburgh Fencers Club D24 2083 1822.50
9 Fraser, Rhys Bluegrass Fencers' Club E24 1875 1590.91
10 Nazario, Dominic Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy D24 1865 1560.78
11 Dunlap, Ian Columbus Fencing And Fitness LLC C24 1850 1538.18
12 Miller, Jonathan Edge of America Fencing D24 2025 1528.41
13 Knibbe, Nathan Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1753 1475.19
14 Towne, Benjamin Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy D23 1801 1469.27
15 Zmuda, Aiden West Michigan Fencing Academy D24 1675 1412.52
16 Kagan, Noah Eminence Fencing Academy U 1615 1333.08
17 Hong, Derek Fencing Center Of Chicago D24 1637 1323.74
18 Ryan, Nash Royal Arts Fencing Academy E24 1570 1127.49
19 Wenger, Liam Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy E24 1389 1074.64
20 Miller, Maxwell Cyranos Place E24 1457 854.68
21 Lim-Seiwert, Tristan Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1231 757.32
22 Tagore, Reyansh Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy E24 1118 661.65
23 Kleckner, Shane Cyranos Place U 1956 616.46
24 Howard, Mekai Shoreline Fencers Club U 850 116.74

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!