WFencing Cleveland Rocks RYC/RJCC

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, November 2, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Woodling Gymnasium - Cleveland State University - Cleveland, OH

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2248 2429 - 2109
5 - 8 2114 2175 - 2038
9 - 16 1813 2062 - 1643
17 - 24 1413 1956 - 965

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Zheng, Marcus Renaissance Fencing Club C24 2429 2176.53
2 Lu, Alex Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy C24 2320 2062.17
3 kennedy, christo Pittsburgh Fencers Club D24 2136 1866.73
4 Fang, Haoyu Renaissance Fencing Club E24 2109 1856.39
5 Copeland, Nigel Cyranos Place C24 2141 1847.86
6 Sun, Henry Pittsburgh Fencers Club D24 2104 1840.72
7 Arata, Connor RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D24 2175 1836.23
8 Toews, Jackson Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club D24 2038 1752.54
9 Fraser, Rhys Bluegrass Fencers' Club E24 1875 1590.90
10 Dunlap, Ian Columbus Fencing And Fitness LLC C24 1866 1552.23
11 Miller, Jonathan Edge of America Fencing D24 2062 1550.41
12 Nazario, Dominic Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy D24 1858 1547.83
13 Knibbe, Nathan Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1753 1475.19
14 Towne, Benjamin Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy D23 1801 1469.27
15 Zmuda, Aiden West Michigan Fencing Academy D24 1643 1380.27
16 Kagan, Noah Eminence Fencing Academy U 1648 1356.24
17 Hong, Derek Fencing Center Of Chicago D24 1628 1305.78
18 Ryan, Nash Royal Arts Fencing Academy E24 1593 1144.06
19 Wenger, Liam Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy E24 1383 1064.10
20 Miller, Maxwell Cyranos Place E24 1457 854.68
21 Lim-Seiwert, Tristan Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1245 765.92
22 Kleckner, Shane Cyranos Place U 1956 616.46
23 Tagore, Reyansh Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy E24 1080 607.87
24 Howard, Mekai Shoreline Fencers Club U 965 144.27

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!