WFencing Cleveland Rocks RYC/RJCC

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, November 2, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Woodling Gymnasium - Cleveland State University - Cleveland, OH

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2332 2551 - 2210
5 - 8 2172 2226 - 2136
9 - 16 1833 2030 - 1690
17 - 24 1416 1956 - 761

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Zheng, Marcus Renaissance Fencing Club C24 2551 2297.57
2 Lu, Alex Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy C24 2335 2078.50
3 Toews, Jackson Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club D24 2232 1971.69
4 Fang, Haoyu Renaissance Fencing Club E24 2210 1957.74
5 Arata, Connor RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D24 2226 1930.67
6 Copeland, Nigel Cyranos Place C24 2180 1897.30
7 Sun, Henry Pittsburgh Fencers Club D24 2146 1888.43
8 kennedy, christo Pittsburgh Fencers Club D24 2136 1866.74
9 Fraser, Rhys Bluegrass Fencers' Club E24 1929 1652.71
10 Dunlap, Ian Columbus Fencing And Fitness LLC C24 1873 1572.56
11 Miller, Jonathan Edge of America Fencing D24 2030 1549.09
12 Nazario, Dominic Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy D24 1833 1533.88
13 Zmuda, Aiden West Michigan Fencing Academy D24 1761 1505.14
14 Knibbe, Nathan Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1753 1475.19
15 Towne, Benjamin Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy D23 1798 1469.69
16 Kagan, Noah Eminence Fencing Academy U 1690 1420.97
17 Hong, Derek Fencing Center Of Chicago D24 1662 1358.54
18 Wenger, Liam Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy E24 1455 1157.86
19 Ryan, Nash Royal Arts Fencing Academy E24 1481 1062.31
20 Tagore, Reyansh Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy E24 1323 937.68
21 Miller, Maxwell Cyranos Place E24 1457 854.68
22 Lim-Seiwert, Tristan Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1231 757.32
23 Kleckner, Shane Cyranos Place U 1956 616.46
24 Howard, Mekai Shoreline Fencers Club U 761 86.56

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!