Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Rachael | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
| 2 | HE Fenghuan | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
| 3 | JING Emily | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 3 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 41% |
| 5 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
| 6 | PEVZNER Victoria | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 7 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 8 | ZHANG Yunjia | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 9 | LUNG Katerina | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 10 | CHEN Jia P. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 11 | WANG Ellen | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
| 12 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 13 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 8% |
| 14 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 4% |
| 15 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 43% | 13% |
| 16 | LI Yuhe | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 17 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 13% |
| 18 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 6% |
| 19 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% |
| 20 | HUANG Natalie | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 3% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 23 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
| 25 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 26 | LIN Zhi tong | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 27 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 2% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | YU Jaime L. | - | 2% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 30 | YAO Ada | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 31 | LEE Lavender | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 32 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 33 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | FU Qihan | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 35 | ZHENG Julie | - | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 36 | CHARALEL Jessica | 2% | 36% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | WANG Jasmine | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | WANG Chloe | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 39 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | 7% | 43% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | HOU Wendong | 15% | 46% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | MCNEILLY-ANTA Isabela | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | SU Michelle | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 43 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | ZHOU Sophia | 47% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 45 | JIANG Claire | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 46 | GAO Anna | 28% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 47 | PAOLINO Audrey | 1% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 48 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 12% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 49 | BAMFORD Anna | 31% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | ROY Layla | 3% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LEE Kaitlyn | 88% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | LIU Sophia | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | TANG Sophia | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | AO Alyssa | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | PAOLINO Grace | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | CHEN Miley | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.