Fencing Institute of Texas Inc. - Carrollton, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BONSELL Vance | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
2 | CONINE Tanner C. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
3 | ZHOU James Y. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
3 | CRAIG Samuel | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
5 | ROE Finnegan | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
6 | LOPEZ Lucas M. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
7 | GUFFEY Christopher | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
8 | CHON Collin | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
9 | LO Bradley | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
10 | KALPATHY Rohit | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
11 | KIM ELIJAH | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
12 | RODGERS Jacob | 2% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
13 | BOSITA Carson | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
14 | WILKINSON James | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
15 | ZHOU William | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
16 | ZLATINSKI Jason | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
17 | PATEL Kush | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
18 | GONZALEZ Jake | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
19 | FOWBLE Chance | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
20 | HUBLALL Ethan | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
21 | XUE Leo | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
22 | OBEID Zaky | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
23 | DANIELL Steven J. | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
24 | MENJIVAR Michael | 2% | 19% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
25 | HOU Yifan | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
26 | KWON Kenneth | 32% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
27 | SMITH Samuel J. | 6% | 40% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.