RYC/RCC of the Rockies

Youth 14 Men’s Foil (Y14MF)

Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 1:00 PM

Register

Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1787 1930 - 1676
5 - 8 1593 1649 - 1461
9 - 16 1449 1566 - 1328
17 - 26 1036 1580 - 559

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Ganapathi, Eshan Prime Fencing Academy U 1930 1667.89
2 Chen, Owen Prime Fencing Academy U 1772 1477.18
3 Alcazaren, Cian Bay Area Fencing Club U 1771 1441.74
4 Alvarez, Francisco Janusz Maximum Fencing Club U 1676 1420.55
5 Lo, Ernest Prime Fencing Academy E25 1649 1326.38
6 Sun, Evan South Denver Fencing Academy E24 1641 1259.86
7 Ward, Spencer Roaring Fork Fencers Club U 1622 1209.17
8 He, Gary Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1461 1157.04
9 Lin, Alden Northwest Fencing Center U 1499 1150.82
10 Li, Jake Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1500 1121.06
11 Minn, Nathan South Denver Fencing Academy U 1566 1118.63
12 Jue, Lucas Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1421 1111.95
13 Leong, Wilson Hua Golden State Fencing Academy U 1437 1092.75
14 Yung, Brandon Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1436 1063.54
15 Sha, Laien LA International Fencing U 1408 1051.39
16 Cheung, Henry Maximum Fencing Club U 1328 997.78
17 Kwong, Colin LA International Fencing U 1310 992.86
18 Collins, Payton South Denver Fencing Academy U 1495 951.35
19 Barnes, Ian South Denver Fencing Academy U 1580 937.40
20 Rothschild, Jonah South Denver Fencing Academy U 1247 679.98
21 Sgouros, Keane South Denver Fencing Academy U 1216 470.39
22 Nguyen, Nolan Maximum Fencing Club U 740 266.36
23 Bhangoo, Arman Golubitsky Fencing Center U 765 253.02
24 Marturano, Leo South Denver Fencing Academy U 860 189.83
25 Schamp, Eliot Piedmont Fencing Team U 559 < 0
26 Nguyen, Maddox Denver Fencing Center U 588 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!