RYC/RCC of the Rockies

Youth 14 Men’s Foil (Y14MF)

Saturday, February 8, 2025 at 1:00 PM

Register

Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1784 1930 - 1667
5 - 8 1589 1649 - 1461
9 - 16 1457 1566 - 1319
17 - 26 1043 1580 - 559

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Ganapathi, Eshan Prime Fencing Academy U 1930 1666.70
2 Chen, Owen Prime Fencing Academy U 1768 1478.32
3 Alcazaren, Cian Bay Area Fencing Club U 1771 1441.74
4 Alvarez, Francisco Janusz Maximum Fencing Club U 1667 1413.29
5 Lo, Ernest Prime Fencing Academy E25 1649 1326.38
6 Sun, Evan South Denver Fencing Academy E24 1623 1253.83
7 Ward, Spencer Roaring Fork Fencers Club U 1622 1209.17
8 He, Gary Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1461 1157.04
9 Li, Jake Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1507 1141.73
10 Minn, Nathan South Denver Fencing Academy U 1566 1132.66
11 Lin, Alden Northwest Fencing Center U 1471 1128.46
12 Yung, Brandon Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1477 1118.46
13 Sha, Laien LA International Fencing U 1454 1118.17
14 Jue, Lucas Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1421 1111.95
15 Leong, Wilson Hua Golden State Fencing Academy U 1439 1101.09
16 Kwong, Colin LA International Fencing U 1319 1004.30
17 Cheung, Henry Maximum Fencing Club U 1315 987.51
18 Barnes, Ian South Denver Fencing Academy U 1580 937.40
19 Collins, Payton South Denver Fencing Academy U 1449 934.65
20 Rothschild, Jonah South Denver Fencing Academy U 1247 679.98
21 Sgouros, Keane South Denver Fencing Academy U 1317 587.95
22 Bhangoo, Arman Golubitsky Fencing Center U 795 296.86
23 Nguyen, Nolan Maximum Fencing Club U 740 266.36
24 Marturano, Leo South Denver Fencing Academy U 837 181.52
25 Schamp, Eliot Piedmont Fencing Team U 559 < 0
26 Nguyen, Maddox Denver Fencing Center U 588 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!