Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | HANSEN Eric J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
2 | SEGAL Mark N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
3 | GAINES Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
3 | CERUTTI Franco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
5 | KURITZ Marc M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% | |
6 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
7 | ALEXANDER Chuck | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
8 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
9 | BAILEY Creston P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
10 | FERRIERE Thomas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - |
11 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
12 | YANG Jerry M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 55% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
13 | KRUGER Mark | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% | |
14 | PARSEGHIAN Missag H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
15 | MENDOZA Zandro | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
16 | LEE Richard U. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
17 | WIESE Michael | 100% | 92% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
18 | RIDLEY Alan P. | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
19 | BAXTER David | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
20 | OLSON Mark R. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
21 | FILONOV Andrei | 100% | 90% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
22 | HOHN dana | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
23 | GALLIVAN James | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.