RYC/RCC of the Rockies

Cadet Men’s Epee (CDTME)

Sunday, February 9, 2025 at 9:00 AM

Register

Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2333 2373 - 2279
5 - 8 2114 2171 - 2037
9 - 16 1900 2065 - 1686
17 - 25 1507 1686 - 1185

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Gacioch, Noah Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) B25 2373 2119.25
2 Lee, Jayden South Denver Fencing Academy B24 2344 2075.92
3 Muenke, Magnus Northern Colorado Fencers C25 2337 2074.20
4 Liu, Josh South Denver Fencing Academy B24 2279 1998.40
5 Tang, Michael Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) E25 2144 1888.78
6 Marencik, Miles Denver Fencing Center C25 2105 1838.61
7 Nikiforov, Timofei The Fencing Center B24 2171 1811.83
8 Miley, Walker Northern Colorado Fencers C25 2037 1768.38
9 Parks-Good, Tyler Alliance Fencing Academy U 2065 1767.29
10 Zhou, Austin South Denver Fencing Academy B23 2029 1650.32
11 Li, Grayson Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1896 1630.17
12 Wang, Jiacheng Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E24 1929 1621.82
13 McLaren, Mason Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) C24 1914 1610.35
14 Leung, Dylan Maximum Fencing Club E24 1869 1608.88
15 Rahman, Yousef Fresno Fencing Club C25 1810 1440.57
16 Rahman, Ali Fresno Fencing Club U 1686 1416.69
17 Emerson, Zachary Denver Fencing Center E24 1590 1297.01
18 Martegani, Enea Northern Colorado Fencers E24 1686 1295.65
19 Wong, Vansen Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1550 1269.74
20 Samimi, Sina Forte Fencing Club U 1613 1225.18
21 Dileep, Roshan Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) E24 1527 1161.82
22 Davidson, James Wasatch Fencing U 1498 1109.86
23 Wylie, Luke Rocky Mountain Fencing Academy D24 1510 967.92
24 Muenke, Torben Northern Colorado Fencers E24 1403 955.57
25 Miller, Xavier Battle Born Fencing Club U 1185 725.10

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!