RYC/RCC of the Rockies

Cadet Men’s Epee (CDTME)

Sunday, February 9, 2025 at 9:00 AM

Register

Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2334 2384 - 2260
5 - 8 2184 2287 - 2125
9 - 16 1913 2037 - 1777
17 - 25 1518 1667 - 1185

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Gacioch, Noah Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) B25 2384 2132.36
2 Muenke, Magnus Northern Colorado Fencers C25 2370 2112.05
3 Lee, Jayden South Denver Fencing Academy B24 2323 2055.64
4 Liu, Josh South Denver Fencing Academy B24 2260 1982.40
5 Nikiforov, Timofei The Fencing Center B24 2287 1954.98
6 Parks-Good, Tyler Alliance Fencing Academy U 2176 1901.71
7 Tang, Michael Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) E25 2150 1896.55
8 Marencik, Miles Denver Fencing Center C25 2125 1863.99
9 Miley, Walker Northern Colorado Fencers C25 2037 1768.38
10 Li, Grayson Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1913 1650.62
11 Zhou, Austin South Denver Fencing Academy B23 2029 1650.32
12 Leung, Dylan Maximum Fencing Club E24 1899 1643.51
13 Wang, Jiacheng Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E24 1929 1621.82
14 McLaren, Mason Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) C24 1912 1610.61
15 Martegani, Enea Northern Colorado Fencers E24 1777 1445.76
16 Rahman, Yousef Fresno Fencing Club C25 1810 1440.57
17 Rahman, Ali Fresno Fencing Club U 1667 1399.82
18 Wong, Vansen Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1592 1317.08
19 Emerson, Zachary Denver Fencing Center E24 1590 1295.94
20 Samimi, Sina Forte Fencing Club U 1620 1258.23
21 Davidson, James Wasatch Fencing U 1572 1201.94
22 Dileep, Roshan Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) E24 1527 1161.82
23 Wylie, Luke Rocky Mountain Fencing Academy D24 1510 967.92
24 Muenke, Torben Northern Colorado Fencers E24 1403 955.57
25 Miller, Xavier Battle Born Fencing Club U 1185 725.10

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!