RYC/RCC of the Rockies

Youth 14 Men’s Epee (Y14ME)

Sunday, February 9, 2025 at 4:00 PM

Register

Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2004 2283 - 1789
5 - 8 1798 1936 - 1717
9 - 16 1600 1856 - 1381
17 - 24 1226 1379 - 845

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Gacioch, Noah Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) C24 2283 2005.66
2 Tang, Michael Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) E24 2100 1813.08
3 Marencik, Miles Denver Fencing Center D24 1845 1541.91
4 Ding, Max Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1789 1532.22
5 Leung, Dylan Maximum Fencing Club E24 1753 1455.60
6 Wang, Jiacheng Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. E24 1785 1436.93
7 Kim, Evan Battle Born Fencing Club U 1717 1425.65
8 Parks-Good, Tyler Alliance Fencing Academy U 1936 1409.11
9 Schwitzer, Eliot Denver Fencing Center E24 1626 1283.54
10 Martegani, Enea Northern Colorado Fencers E24 1856 1272.56
11 Yu, Brandon Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1529 1227.92
12 Liu, Xuyao Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1499 1200.47
13 Samimi, Sina Forte Fencing Club U 1724 1191.59
14 Li, Grayson Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1545 1189.13
15 Paradkar, Akshay Northern Colorado Fencers U 1641 924.72
16 Dileep, Roshan Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) E24 1381 918.25
17 Davidson, James Wasatch Fencing U 1379 787.33
18 Wang, Dylan LA International Fencing U 1340 778.68
19 Muenke, Torben Northern Colorado Fencers E24 1339 653.07
20 Miller, Xavier Battle Born Fencing Club U 1216 622.08
21 Szeto, Zachary Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) U 1289 512.54
22 Gurolnick, Michael Denver Fencing Center U 1327 147.18
23 Emerson, Nicholas Denver Fencing Center U 1073 < 0
24 Song, Jonathan West Berkeley Fencing Club U 845 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!