Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 79% |
| 2 | LEE Olivia | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 24% | |
| 3 | MUN Brianna K. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
| 3 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% |
| 5 | LEE Natasha | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% | |
| 6 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 7 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | - | 1% | 15% | 48% | 36% | |
| 8 | LEE Camilla | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% | |
| 9 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 75% |
| 10 | KUKVA Taisiya | - | - | 1% | 19% | 50% | 30% | |
| 11 | HSIU Elizabeth | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 10% | |
| 12 | HUANG Lanlan | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
| 13 | LEE Samantha X. | 1% | 14% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 14 | SYKES Elynor | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 17 | PECK Maia A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
| 18 | XU Celina | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 19 | HAU Olivia | - | 1% | 9% | 49% | 35% | 7% | |
| 20 | GUO Luxi | - | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
| 21 | PHUKAN Indra | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 22 | CHANG Celine A. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 2% |
| 23 | WANG Angelina | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | OBERDERFER Viktoriia | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 25 | MENDOZA zoie | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | DUONG Zoey | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 28 | DRYSDALE Lita | 1% | 8% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 3% | |
| 28 | GUESNARD Maelig | 14% | 48% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | CHUNG Penelope | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 31 | SCANLAN Claire | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 32 | PEI Audrey | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 33 | KIM Jayna | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 45% | 15% |
| 34 | CHANG Ella | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 35 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 36 | YAO Yilin | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 36 | WANG Ziqi | - | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 25% | |
| 38 | SHELIN Chelsea | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
| 39 | BROWN Riley | 3% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LIANG Jingjing | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | DING Grace | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | RUIZ Lusciana | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 43 | POON Desiree | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | BLANCO Ariia | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | LEWIS Rachel | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | SAID Riana | - | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 4% | |
| 47 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | GITI Aria | 15% | 44% | 36% | 5% | - | - | |
| 49 | MOHEBI Neeka | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | BENNETT Vienne | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 51 | MOLLINIER Angel | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 52 | LAI Amanda | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | MULAGARI Swarasai | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 54 | CZAPLA Dominika | 37% | 46% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | ESTRADA Ariana | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | JAMES Ashley | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | HASIM Eurietta | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 58 | CHEN Samantha | 33% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 59 | STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 60 | LEE Emma | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | IINO Kennedy | 17% | 48% | 32% | 3% | - | - | |
| 62 | ADUSUMILLI Rishitha | 18% | 49% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 63 | LEE Valerie | 17% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | BAUTISTA DE ROBLES Ekaterine | 10% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | YOUSSEF Caroline | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.