Chelsea Piers Connecticut and Tim Morehouse Fencing Club - CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GHEDINI Luca | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 2 | TANG Terry | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 3 | LEE Eugene | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 3 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Muhammad | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 26% |
| 5 | CHENG Ethan | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 6 | ZHAO Adam | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
| 7 | CHO Xzander | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 32% | 6% |
| 8 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 46% | 34% |
| 9 | GERRISH William | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 10 | WANG Brian | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | DHANOA Kian | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 12 | XIE Jicheng | - | - | 5% | 20% | 39% | 31% | 5% |
| 13 | TOOMRE Kai | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 7% |
| 14 | CHEN Ethan | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 15 | FOGELSON Hugh | 6% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | LIU ERIC | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | SHENG Dalton | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 18 | SHANNON Jack | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 19 | BAI Brian | 3% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 20 | O'LEARY Colin | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | WANG Luke | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 22 | WONG Jacob W. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 23 | CHUNG Ian | 37% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 24 | YANG Dylan | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 25 | MENDEZ Ren | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 26 | TAM Kyle | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 27 | JURMAN Therin | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | ARCE Andrew W. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
| 28 | YAVENDITTI William | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | CHENG Austyn | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | MARTIRE Luca | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | KRZYWON Dylan | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 33 | HOU Gaven | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | WANG ZEYU | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 35 | SUNDSTROM Wren | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | PEZY Felix | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 37 | ONIK Ari N. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | LIN Dexter | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | HU Daniel | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | ZHANG ethan | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | BO Aiden | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 42 | CHEN kenneth | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.