Chelsea Piers Connecticut and Tim Morehouse Fencing Club - CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 86% |
| 2 | MI Aileen | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
| 3 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% |
| 3 | FENG Grace | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 2% |
| 5 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% |
| 6 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | 4% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% |
| 7 | SHENG Chuxi | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% | |
| 8 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 42% | 31% | 7% |
| 9 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% |
| 10 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% |
| 11 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 12 | YANG Lingting | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
| 13 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 46% | 29% |
| 14 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 15 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 50% | 14% |
| 16 | LIN Victoria T. | - | 7% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 17 | YANG Emma | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 18 | ZHANG Selena | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | FIELD Julianna | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | NEUMAN Sophie | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 21 | SHIM Grace J. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 22 | ROY Layla | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 23 | PAULUS Isabella | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 24 | LEVY Avery | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% | - |
| 25 | PAULUS Sloane | - | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 26 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 21% | 45% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | LENZ Zoe N. | 1% | 30% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 28 | LI Eleanor | 1% | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 29 | CHEN Sophie | 14% | 54% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 30 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 14% | 48% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | BERGEL Daphne | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | HWANG Chanel | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 1% | 17% | 47% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
| 34 | WANG Reese | 10% | 45% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 71% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 36 | BURUMA JOSEPHINE | 4% | 25% | 47% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | LIAW Elaine | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 38 | YU Jane | 35% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | SHI Sasha | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | LIU Long | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | 69% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.