Chelsea Piers Connecticut and Tim Morehouse Fencing Club - CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KIM Shaun M. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 2 | FENG Leo | V V V D V | V V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | MORALES Jonathan | V V V V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | OH Triton | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 5 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 6 | SUGIURA Samuel | V V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 7 | LAU Justin Y. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | FIELDS Matthew S. | D D D V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 9 | BRANDT Jaden | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 10 | ATWOOD Griffin | V V V V D | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 11 | KATZ Ryan | V V D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 12 | HUANG Alexander C. | V V V D | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 13 | HUANG Alex F. | D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 14 | WAXLER Seth B. | V V D D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 15 | SHAH Sajan | V D V V D | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 16 | TASIKAS Stylianos | V V V D D | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 17 | DEPEW Spencer | V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 18 | BERA Enzo | V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 19 | GONG Jerry | D V V V V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 20 | KIM Ethan | V V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 21 | YOO Maxwell | D V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 22 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | D V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 23 | LAUB William | D D V V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 24 | CHUNG Connor | V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | TSAO Oliver | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 26 | NGUYEN Anthony | D D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 27 | CHENG Hong | D V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 28 | KILGALLEN William | V D D V D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 29 | SMINK Oliver | D V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 30 | CHOKSI Vihaan | D D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 31 | MATTOO Surya | D D D V D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 32 | OLOUGHLIN Quin | D D D D V | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 33 | LEONARD Charles | D V V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 34 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 35 | MANESCU Miron | V V D V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 36 | ANAND Sahil Z. | V V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 37 | KAUFFMAN James | D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 38 | FREDRICK Jameer | V D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 39 | WAXLER Ryan | V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 40 | WANG Daniel | D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 41 | HO Jacob | D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 42 | MATTOO Deven | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 42 | LEE Andrew | D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 44 | XU Justin | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 44 | COUNTS Nicholas | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 46 | WONG Caleb W. | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 47 | SIMMONS John M. | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 48 | MARGULIS Jared | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 49 | KULKARNI Rohan | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 50 | KIARA Kinoti | D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 51 | MATTINGLY Ian | D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 52 | TSAO Alister | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 53 | KOGAN Joseph | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.