Berto Center / Also known as Felicity School - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 21% | |
| 2 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 3 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% |
| 3 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 58% | |
| 5 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 6 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 7 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
| 8 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 9 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
| 10 | LI Bradley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | |
| 11 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 12 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% |
| 13 | DENG David | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% | |
| 14 | TANG Royce | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 15 | MANDZY Theodor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% |
| 16 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 17 | CHANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 3% |
| 19 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 20 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 21 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 22 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 20% |
| 23 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
| 24 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% | |
| 25 | SUAREZ David | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 26 | XU Nathan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
| 27 | KNIBBE Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
| 28 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 29 | LIU Yinhong | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
| 30 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% | |
| 31 | KO Caleb | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 2% | |
| 32 | KAGAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 3% | |
| 33 | WANG Tiger | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 34 | SCHRANK Edward | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | WANG Caleb | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | TACK Everett | 100% | 89% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | OZAWA Taishi | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 38 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 89% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | PAYNE Lynas | 100% | 96% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 41 | WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) | 100% | 94% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | DIFRANK Tae | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | GOGOI Kavi | 100% | 76% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | ZHAO Jason | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | HONG Derek | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 46 | ZHANG Hanson | 100% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 47 | DIFRANK Avery | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | NAIDL Micah | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 50 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 100% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | CHASE Crosby | 100% | 84% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | IBRAHIM Khaden | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | SHAH Aadi | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | HALLETTMANES Ezra | 100% | 68% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 57 | CHAN William | 100% | 97% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 58 | NG Gavin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.