Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GRADY Miriam A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 2 | KWON Athina | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 56% | 32% |
| 3 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
| 3 | WANG Karen | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
| 5 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 6 | HONG Elaine | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | - |
| 7 | LOMBARD Ella | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 8 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 43% | 13% | |
| 9 | LIPTHAY Hanna | - | - | 1% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 10 | TYLER Syd | - | - | - | - | 6% | 43% | 52% |
| 11 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | - | - | 5% | 27% | 48% | 19% | |
| 12 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
| 13 | TIMMONS Sarah J. | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 14 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% | |
| 15 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 16 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
| 17 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 18 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 18% | 2% | |
| 19 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 20 | BOLES Sophia | - | - | 3% | 23% | 57% | 16% | 1% |
| 21 | MOOR Alexandra | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | XIONG Angelica | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | NELSON Grace E. | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | ZAKAS Anna L. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 25 | SHEVCHENKO Viktoriia | - | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 26 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 27 | WRIGHT Margaret A. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
| 28 | MCKENNA Analise | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 29 | BINDAS Blodwen S. | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 42% | 13% | |
| 30 | BOTNER Olivia | 2% | 20% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 31 | YOON Julia J. | - | < 1% | 1% | 10% | 34% | 47% | 8% |
| 32 | ABDULLAHI Salma | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | LEWIS Sophia | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 5% | 41% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | KIZILBASH Zara | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 36 | STONER Shanrael M. | 1% | 13% | 41% | 37% | 7% | - | - |
| 37 | SWENSON Alexandra | 4% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | NGUYEN Ella | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 39 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | - | 3% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 5% | |
| 40 | FAN Elizabeth | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | ONO Melisa | 1% | 13% | 43% | 36% | 7% | - | - |
| 42 | CHUANG Ramona | 24% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 43 | ARAYE Nasro | 8% | 45% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | MACEY Hadley | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 45 | MIINEA Elena | 9% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | MOHAMED Faisa | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | BO GENESIS | 18% | 50% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 48 | TANG Elaine | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | OLIVEIRA Giovanna | 14% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | < 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 51 | LUNDSGAARD Emily | 53% | 39% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | MANCELL Hope | 46% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.