Santa Clara, CA - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | LI Phoebe J. | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
2 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | - | 4% | 34% | 62% |
3 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | - | 3% | 24% | 73% |
3 | KOROL Neta | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
5 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
6 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 56% |
7 | KIM Katherine | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
8 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 30% | 3% |
9 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
10 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
10 | KOROL Dana | - | 2% | 19% | 48% | 28% | 4% |
12 | SHIH Diane | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
13 | PANT Anisha | - | - | 5% | 26% | 52% | 16% |
14 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | 6% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 2% |
15 | LEE Bethanie | - | - | 6% | 32% | 47% | 14% |
16 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
17 | CUI Melody J. | - | 4% | 35% | 44% | 16% | 1% |
18 | PENG Amber L. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
19 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 10% | 37% | 43% | 9% |
20 | TOM Caitlyn | - | 3% | 30% | 46% | 19% | 2% |
21 | LUO Sandra J. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
22 | HSIUNG Samantha | 13% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
23 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
24 | KOSLOW Amicie | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
25 | HO Rachel E. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
26 | WELBORN Calissa | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
27 | UMAP Arna | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
28 | HOBSON Ava | 14% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 1% | - |
29 | WANG Celine S. | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
30 | GONG Chloe | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 3% | - |
31 | OHALLORAN Zoe | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
32 | RAO Sonia D. | 9% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - |
33 | ZHANG Eunice | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
34 | BOLES Amanda X. | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - |
35 | NAIR Supriya | 6% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - |
36 | FUNG Emma | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
37 | MANN Sophia J. | 3% | 34% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
38 | LUH Mia P. | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
39 | GREEN Perri L. | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
40 | ENRILE Erica | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - |
41 | TSANG Catherine | 3% | 37% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - |
42 | NAGPAL Reyna | 79% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - |
43 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
44 | PATTERSON Natalia | 19% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
45 | NICKOLOV Nora | 13% | 67% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
46 | XU Audrey J. | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
47 | SALAMATI Soraya A. | 20% | 55% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
48 | ZHENG Zoe | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.