Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 2 | WU Helen | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 7% |
| 3 | GHAYALOD reya | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
| 3 | LIU Sophie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
| 5 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 80% |
| 6 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 37% | |
| 7 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% | |
| 8 | JEONG Katie | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 9 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
| 10 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 11 | KER Grace | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% |
| 12 | YANG Angelina LeLe | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 13 | XIAO julie | - | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 8% |
| 14 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% |
| 15 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 16 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 17 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 18 | HILD Nisha | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 19 | NATH Trisha | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 18% | |
| 20 | MULAGARI Sadhika | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 48% | 27% |
| 22 | HUNG Anna | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 23 | SHI Cathleen | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 24 | YUAN Greta | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 25 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 40% | 8% |
| 26 | CHANG Audrey | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | FEIG Sela | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 29 | HUAI Delilah | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | SO Catelyn | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 31 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 32 | CHEN Ashley | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 6% |
| 33 | DUCKETT Madison | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 34 | LU Elaine | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% |
| 35 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 2% |
| 36 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 37 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% | |
| 38 | XIONG Haojiao | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
| 39 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% |
| 40 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 44% | 21% |
| 41 | YU Zhiang | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 42 | LEE Hannah | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% |
| 43 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 44 | MUND Ruth | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 16% | 2% |
| 45 | MANN Sophia J. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 47 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 48 | SHEARER Natalie E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% |
| 49 | MARYASH Samantha | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 50 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 51 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 52 | SENOGLU Irmak | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 53 | JUNG Irene | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 54 | SINHA Anika | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 55 | SHTREVENSKY Maria | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 56 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 57 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 58 | SHI Julia | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 59 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 60 | CHO Michelle | 7% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | LIU Sydney | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 62 | DANTULURI Shalini | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 63 | MAKLIN Sofia | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 64 | CHEN Jessica | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 65 | KIM Marley I. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 66 | LUKER Sophia | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 67 | TONG Jessie | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 68 | FESTA Carina | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 69 | BARNOVITZ Maya | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
| 70 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 71 | KONDEV Elizabeth | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
| 72 | WEI Vivian W. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 2% |
| 73 | BUSH Bethany | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 74 | LIN Nicole | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 75 | DAI Olivia | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 76 | NAYAK Esha | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 77 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 78 | WANG Zidan | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 79 | SCOTT Eve | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 79 | BERMAN greta | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 81 | TSUI Natalie | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 82 | PENG Florella | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 83 | ZOLLER Noelle | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 84 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 85 | YANG Lea | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 86 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 87 | LEE Sophia | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 88 | ZHANG Chenfei | - | 6% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 89 | LIM Jaslene | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 90 | LESSARD-KULCHYSKI Khloé | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 91 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 92 | KHAN Alissa | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 93 | DIECK Miranda P. | 1% | 12% | 41% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 94 | MALEK Zolie | 5% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 94 | ZENG Sarah | 1% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 96 | LIU Yifei | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 96 | TAN Adelyn | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 98 | LO JOCELYN | 2% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 99 | KUANG TongFei | 5% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 100 | KINKADE Ellie | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 101 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 23% | |
| 102 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | |
| 103 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 104 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 105 | BOYNTON Ainsley | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 106 | FENG Alicia G. | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 107 | CANSECO Carly | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 108 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 109 | CAO Sophie | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 110 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | 3% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 111 | CHUNG Hailey | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 1% |
| 112 | CHAPMAN-LAYLAND Astrid M. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 113 | NAYAK Indra | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 114 | BAINS Nandini | 37% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 115 | STONE Coral | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 116 | CHAVAN Arya | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 117 | LUKER Hannah | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 118 | DHAR Layla | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 119 | TUNG Renee | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 120 | FREEMAN Armine | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 121 | KIM Elyssa | 16% | 53% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 122 | HU Michelle | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 123 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 124 | WEI JoyAnn | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 124 | PABIAN Emilia | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 126 | FERNANDEZ Martina | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 127 | HENRY Soraya S. | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 128 | FLATT Sophia | - | 3% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 129 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 129 | MOK Charlotte | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 131 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 5% | 29% | 47% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 132 | GOLDIN Nina | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 133 | WANG Callie | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 134 | GOURNEAU Sophie L. | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 134 | LI Alexis | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 136 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 137 | DUDNICK Morgan | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 138 | BORGUETA Madison | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 139 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 139 | ZHANG Victoria | 1% | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 141 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 141 | TURIANO Nadelle | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 143 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 144 | YOUNG Audrey | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 145 | LI Sonia | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 146 | CHAN Jolene | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 147 | LOO Kaitlyn | 3% | 32% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 148 | KNOBEL Sophia | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 149 | TREACY Aisling | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 150 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 151 | NGUYEN Siena | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 152 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 153 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 154 | KHOST Maeve | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 155 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 156 | HAN Emma | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 156 | ZAWADA Milena | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 156 | LIU Finn | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 159 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 160 | ZHANG Emily | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 161 | WILLEY Celeste | 27% | 48% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 161 | DANTULURI Shivani | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 163 | ERBSEN Sarah | 62% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.