1st Annual Battle Born RYC and RJC

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Sunday, December 15, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

Tarkanian Basketball Center - Las Vegas, NV

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1768 1876 - 1672
5 - 8 1566 1600 - 1503
9 - 16 1453 1875 - 1209
17 - 29 1023 1241 - 648

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wong, Kyle Fortune Fencing U 1876 1617.69
2 Yoo, Lucas TeamK Fencing U 1846 1583.40
3 Yi, Alexander Fortune Fencing U 1672 1402.68
4 Nguyen, Norris Maximum Fencing Club U 1680 1358.11
5 Tian, Dylan Yang Fencing Club U 1588 1292.92
6 Yoon, Ian LA International Fencing U 1571 1259.14
7 Wang, Ryan Battle Born Fencing Club U 1600 1225.31
8 Chu, Clayton TeamK Fencing U 1503 1198.26
9 Lin, Logan Maximum Fencing Club U 1548 1185.23
10 Bush, Andrew Team Touche Fencing Center U 1476 1127.42
11 Wang, Sean Battle Born Fencing Club U 1547 1108.72
12 Teng, Eric LA International Fencing U 1380 1055.78
13 Jung, David German Fencing Academy U 1875 949.13
14 Li, Ethan Team Touche Fencing Center U 1271 936.26
15 Xue, Jason LA International Fencing U 1316 893.14
16 Si, Alexander Swords Fencing Studio U 1209 766.87
17 Won, Jacob TeamK Fencing U 1103 735.79
18 Chaudhary, Oliver Battle Born Fencing Club U 1229 730.91
19 Demirchian, Edward LA International Fencing U 1241 730.05
20 Wang, Franklin Maximum Fencing Club U 1058 712.41
21 Lau, Jesse Team Touche Fencing Center U 1176 688.31
22 Lee, Paxton Fortune Fencing U 1123 664.20
23 Lee, Connor Fortune Fencing U 1090 662.55
24 Lu, Jayden Swords Fencing Studio U 1043 633.73
25 Kou, Logan Beverly Hills Fencers' Club U 1015 548.52
26 Gan, Samuel Schoolhouse Fencing U 951 488.09
27 Lee, Daniel TeamK Fencing U 911 440.17
28 Shih, Eli Las Vegas Fencing Academy U 711 45.25
29 Kim, Ian LA International Fencing U 648 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!