1st Annual Battle Born RYC and RJC

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Sunday, December 15, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

Tarkanian Basketball Center - Las Vegas, NV

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1755 1894 - 1622
5 - 8 1555 1600 - 1504
9 - 16 1371 1547 - 1162
17 - 29 1075 2018 - 490

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wong, Kyle Fortune Fencing U 1894 1628.36
2 Yoo, Lucas TeamK Fencing U 1819 1543.65
3 Nguyen, Norris Maximum Fencing Club U 1684 1348.48
4 Yi, Alexander Fortune Fencing U 1622 1345.85
5 Yoon, Ian LA International Fencing U 1592 1250.65
6 Wang, Ryan Battle Born Fencing Club U 1600 1225.31
7 Chu, Clayton TeamK Fencing U 1525 1206.20
8 Tian, Dylan Yang Fencing Club U 1504 1182.87
9 Lin, Logan Maximum Fencing Club U 1516 1109.56
10 Wang, Sean Battle Born Fencing Club U 1547 1108.72
11 Teng, Eric LA International Fencing U 1408 1065.88
12 Bush, Andrew Team Touche Fencing Center U 1436 1063.89
13 Li, Ethan Team Touche Fencing Center U 1284 917.84
14 Xue, Jason LA International Fencing U 1339 890.92
15 Si, Alexander Swords Fencing Studio U 1273 810.43
16 Won, Jacob TeamK Fencing U 1162 782.61
17 Chaudhary, Oliver Battle Born Fencing Club U 1292 761.18
18 Wang, Franklin Maximum Fencing Club U 1117 735.00
19 Jung, David German Fencing Academy U 2018 679.11
20 Lu, Jayden Swords Fencing Studio U 1060 635.44
21 Lee, Connor Fortune Fencing U 1041 563.91
22 Demirchian, Edward LA International Fencing U 1168 561.31
23 Gan, Samuel Schoolhouse Fencing U 1053 558.36
24 Lee, Paxton Fortune Fencing U 1061 522.15
25 Kou, Logan Beverly Hills Fencers' Club U 1013 492.01
26 Lee, Daniel TeamK Fencing U 863 326.71
27 Lau, Jesse Team Touche Fencing Center U 986 303.82
28 Shih, Eli Las Vegas Fencing Academy U 819 18.42
29 Kim, Ian LA International Fencing U 490 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!