1st Annual Battle Born RYC and RJC

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Sunday, December 15, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

Tarkanian Basketball Center - Las Vegas, NV

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1774 1894 - 1680
5 - 8 1597 1616 - 1580
9 - 16 1469 1875 - 1280
17 - 29 1032 1286 - 684

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wong, Kyle Fortune Fencing U 1894 1636.13
2 Yoo, Lucas TeamK Fencing U 1829 1567.43
3 Yi, Alexander Fortune Fencing U 1693 1429.36
4 Nguyen, Norris Maximum Fencing Club U 1680 1358.11
5 Tian, Dylan Yang Fencing Club U 1616 1326.50
6 Yoon, Ian LA International Fencing U 1580 1274.87
7 Bush, Andrew Team Touche Fencing Center U 1587 1268.87
8 Lin, Logan Maximum Fencing Club U 1605 1256.49
9 Wang, Ryan Battle Born Fencing Club U 1600 1225.31
10 Chu, Clayton TeamK Fencing U 1473 1172.71
11 Wang, Sean Battle Born Fencing Club U 1547 1108.72
12 Teng, Eric LA International Fencing U 1392 1070.98
13 Li, Ethan Team Touche Fencing Center U 1286 963.63
14 Jung, David German Fencing Academy U 1875 949.13
15 Xue, Jason LA International Fencing U 1280 886.53
16 Lau, Jesse Team Touche Fencing Center U 1300 870.95
17 Demirchian, Edward LA International Fencing U 1286 820.95
18 Si, Alexander Swords Fencing Studio U 1209 766.87
19 Won, Jacob TeamK Fencing U 1116 756.88
20 Chaudhary, Oliver Battle Born Fencing Club U 1229 730.91
21 Wang, Franklin Maximum Fencing Club U 1041 704.33
22 Lee, Paxton Fortune Fencing U 1102 650.39
23 Lee, Connor Fortune Fencing U 1037 623.92
24 Lu, Jayden Swords Fencing Studio U 1008 607.90
25 Lee, Daniel TeamK Fencing U 1004 569.12
26 Kou, Logan Beverly Hills Fencers' Club U 994 533.95
27 Gan, Samuel Schoolhouse Fencing U 951 488.09
28 Shih, Eli Las Vegas Fencing Academy U 684 28.55
29 Kim, Ian LA International Fencing U 759 19.56

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!