1st Annual Battle Born RYC and RJC

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Sunday, December 15, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

Tarkanian Basketball Center - Las Vegas, NV

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1795 1888 - 1682
5 - 8 1601 1674 - 1520
9 - 16 1466 1875 - 1241
17 - 29 1056 1276 - 634

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Yoo, Lucas TeamK Fencing U 1888 1631.40
2 Wong, Kyle Fortune Fencing U 1868 1613.35
3 Lin, Logan Maximum Fencing Club U 1743 1427.17
4 Yi, Alexander Fortune Fencing U 1682 1419.38
5 Tian, Dylan Yang Fencing Club U 1674 1398.85
6 Nguyen, Norris Maximum Fencing Club U 1650 1337.53
7 Bush, Andrew Team Touche Fencing Center U 1559 1252.91
8 Yoon, Ian LA International Fencing U 1520 1226.00
9 Wang, Ryan Battle Born Fencing Club U 1600 1225.31
10 Chu, Clayton TeamK Fencing U 1477 1186.90
11 Wang, Sean Battle Born Fencing Club U 1547 1108.72
12 Teng, Eric LA International Fencing U 1377 1058.85
13 Lau, Jesse Team Touche Fencing Center U 1342 968.35
14 Li, Ethan Team Touche Fencing Center U 1265 952.85
15 Jung, David German Fencing Academy U 1875 949.13
16 Wang, Franklin Maximum Fencing Club U 1241 936.34
17 Xue, Jason LA International Fencing U 1276 899.77
18 Si, Alexander Swords Fencing Studio U 1218 790.63
19 Demirchian, Edward LA International Fencing U 1235 784.81
20 Won, Jacob TeamK Fencing U 1097 742.01
21 Lee, Paxton Fortune Fencing U 1141 737.69
22 Chaudhary, Oliver Battle Born Fencing Club U 1213 721.45
23 Lee, Daniel TeamK Fencing U 1093 700.45
24 Lee, Connor Fortune Fencing U 1021 631.67
25 Lu, Jayden Swords Fencing Studio U 1019 624.51
26 Kou, Logan Beverly Hills Fencers' Club U 987 559.74
27 Gan, Samuel Schoolhouse Fencing U 990 531.10
28 Kim, Ian LA International Fencing U 802 122.20
29 Shih, Eli Las Vegas Fencing Academy U 634 5.06

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!