1st Annual Battle Born RYC and RJC

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Sunday, December 15, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

Tarkanian Basketball Center - Las Vegas, NV

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1762 1892 - 1630
5 - 8 1571 1644 - 1475
9 - 16 1327 1430 - 1167
17 - 29 1141 2018 - 668

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wong, Kyle Fortune Fencing U 1892 1614.44
2 Nguyen, Norris Maximum Fencing Club U 1822 1419.31
3 Yoo, Lucas TeamK Fencing U 1706 1379.54
4 Yi, Alexander Fortune Fencing U 1630 1322.03
5 Chu, Clayton TeamK Fencing U 1526 1153.85
6 Wang, Sean Battle Born Fencing Club U 1644 1139.71
7 Lin, Logan Maximum Fencing Club U 1639 1090.43
8 Wang, Ryan Battle Born Fencing Club U 1475 1041.54
9 Teng, Eric LA International Fencing U 1430 1034.59
10 Bush, Andrew Team Touche Fencing Center U 1417 984.23
11 Li, Ethan Team Touche Fencing Center U 1316 912.54
12 Tian, Dylan Yang Fencing Club U 1223 815.62
13 Yoon, Ian LA International Fencing U 1299 815.48
14 Si, Alexander Swords Fencing Studio U 1424 769.35
15 Chaudhary, Oliver Battle Born Fencing Club U 1340 717.55
16 Lu, Jayden Swords Fencing Studio U 1167 685.66
17 Jung, David German Fencing Academy U 2018 679.11
18 Won, Jacob TeamK Fencing U 1119 675.75
19 Demirchian, Edward LA International Fencing U 1491 646.79
20 Lee, Connor Fortune Fencing U 1241 551.24
21 Gan, Samuel Schoolhouse Fencing U 1088 544.07
22 Wang, Franklin Maximum Fencing Club U 954 501.97
23 Xue, Jason LA International Fencing U 1202 457.29
24 Lee, Daniel TeamK Fencing U 901 344.70
25 Lau, Jesse Team Touche Fencing Center U 1245 324.49
26 Shih, Eli Las Vegas Fencing Academy U 953 66.36
27 Lee, Paxton Fortune Fencing U 1096 < 0
28 Kou, Logan Beverly Hills Fencers' Club U 668 < 0
29 Kim, Ian LA International Fencing U 854 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!