1st Annual Battle Born RYC and RJC

Youth 10 Men’s Epee (Y10ME)

Sunday, December 15, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

Tarkanian Basketball Center - Las Vegas, NV

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1746 1880 - 1623
5 - 8 1573 1613 - 1504
9 - 16 1363 1563 - 1126
17 - 29 1079 2018 - 682

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wong, Kyle Fortune Fencing U 1880 1616.40
2 Yoo, Lucas TeamK Fencing U 1798 1525.89
3 Nguyen, Norris Maximum Fencing Club U 1682 1351.27
4 Yi, Alexander Fortune Fencing U 1623 1349.03
5 Yoon, Ian LA International Fencing U 1613 1286.69
6 Tian, Dylan Yang Fencing Club U 1576 1269.27
7 Wang, Ryan Battle Born Fencing Club U 1600 1225.31
8 Chu, Clayton TeamK Fencing U 1504 1191.20
9 Lin, Logan Maximum Fencing Club U 1563 1172.80
10 Wang, Sean Battle Born Fencing Club U 1547 1108.72
11 Bush, Andrew Team Touche Fencing Center U 1440 1075.09
12 Teng, Eric LA International Fencing U 1392 1056.06
13 Li, Ethan Team Touche Fencing Center U 1277 919.63
14 Xue, Jason LA International Fencing U 1334 886.52
15 Si, Alexander Swords Fencing Studio U 1227 778.44
16 Won, Jacob TeamK Fencing U 1126 753.73
17 Chaudhary, Oliver Battle Born Fencing Club U 1229 730.91
18 Wang, Franklin Maximum Fencing Club U 1066 692.28
19 Jung, David German Fencing Academy U 2018 679.11
20 Lu, Jayden Swords Fencing Studio U 1046 626.64
21 Lee, Paxton Fortune Fencing U 1110 625.35
22 Demirchian, Edward LA International Fencing U 1173 605.67
23 Lee, Connor Fortune Fencing U 1019 551.84
24 Gan, Samuel Schoolhouse Fencing U 1011 530.21
25 Kou, Logan Beverly Hills Fencers' Club U 1015 522.40
26 Lee, Daniel TeamK Fencing U 966 461.62
27 Lau, Jesse Team Touche Fencing Center U 940 288.34
28 Shih, Eli Las Vegas Fencing Academy U 749 < 0
29 Kim, Ian LA International Fencing U 682 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!