Fike Recreation Center - Clemson, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MELLONE Carl (Carlo) J. | - | - | - | - | - | 5% | 95% |
2 | LISSO Ria A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 41% | 48% | |
3 | RABINOWITZ Mike | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 6% | |
3 | DILLE Carolina G. | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 48% | 11% | |
5 | BALLOU Johnathan | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
6 | SEOL Kyung | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
7 | HUSSAIN Mustafa | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 41% | |
8 | PROUDNIK Anthony | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
9 | BULEY Andrew | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
10 | VAN NIMWEGEN Nicholas | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 37% | 8% | - |
11 | BOWMAN Tamara E. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | |
12 | BURLESON Aidan J. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
13 | COLLIER Nathanael L. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
14 | MCKINNEY Daniel | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
15 | FERNANDEZ Ruben | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
16 | CROWLEY James | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
17 | GIBBS Mason | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 14% | |
18 | HAGEN Samuel | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
19 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
20 | MERRIMAN Morgan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
21 | FERRARO Nicholas | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - | |
22 | PATTERSON Michael | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
23 | HARKONEN Eemil | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
24 | ADAMSON Garren | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | GRIFFIS Abbie | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
26 | RYAN Alyssa | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
27 | STEWART Madeline | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
28 | RATTANA Anushawn | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | - |
30 | MCCLURE Morgan | 7% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | |
31 | HAUSER Samuel | 1% | 11% | 39% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
32 | JONES Ezekiel | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
33 | WEAVER Charles | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
34 | REYES Ande | 33% | 47% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
35 | SCALLY Mamoun | 10% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
36 | LOPES Beatriz | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | - |
37 | YI Jonathan | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
38 | MEYERS Lucas | 21% | 44% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
39 | CROSS Phoenix | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
40 | THU John | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
41 | WANG Mohan | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
42 | FOLK William | 1% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
43 | THOMPSON Rachel | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
44 | THARRINGTON Samuel | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 1% | |
45 | MULLIS Triston | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.