Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 2 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 9% |
| 3 | LEE Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 3 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% |
| 5 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
| 6 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 7 | KOVACH Jonah F. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 8 | KILGALLEN William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 9 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 9% |
| 10 | TURCK Caspar J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 11 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% |
| 12 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 13 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | HOPPA Luke H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 16 | HUANG Alex F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% |
| 17 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 3% |
| 18 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 18% |
| 19 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 46% | 17% | 3% |
| 20 | OH Triton | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 21 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | WAXLER Seth B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% |
| 23 | LEONARD Charles | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 24 | WASSERMAN Aiden | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 26 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 27 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 28 | DVORIN Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
| 29 | STURN Oliver | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | WANG Robert | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | DOWNEY Baran | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | SIMMONS John M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 35 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 39 | LAU Justin Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 40 | SUBRAMANIAM Oliver C. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 40 | KESSLER Nathan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 42 | OU Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 44 | PILAT Matthew J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 45 | BELZ Filip | 100% | 69% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | CAMPO Alexander P. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | TVERSKOY Sam | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 49 | MILLER Guy | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | CHENG Hong | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | TANG Charles | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | DUCKETT Myles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 53 | MANGAN Daniel Marsh | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | VIME-OLIVE Liam A. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | HWANG Nathaniel | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | RUSSELL Clark | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.