Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | EVERHART Ryan | V V V D | V V V V | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 2 | BOLARIN Oluwatosin N. | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 3 | MARCUS Peter | V V V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 3 | THOMAS Samuel | D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 5 | MCNICHOLAS Evan | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 6 | KRAVITZ Sarah | D V V V | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 7 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | V V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 8 | STENNIS Brendan | D V V D V | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 9 | LASKA Patryk | V D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 10 | RIPLEY Ian | D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 11 | LAUER Michael | V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 12 | SWANSON Dave | V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 13 | REED Allen | V D D D V | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 14 | AGUILAR Nicolas | D V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 15 | SOARE Maria Elena | V D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 17 | THRASHER Andrew | D D V V | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 | |
| 18 | BETTRIDGE Jessica | V D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 19 | MENTELE Caden | V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 20 | YANG SeungJoo "SJ" | D D D V D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 21 | CRAPNELL Daniel | D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 22 | BESEL Natalie | D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 23 | KOZINSKI Allison | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.