Duel in Dallas ROC/RJCC/RYC

Junior Women’s Saber (JNRWS)

Saturday, November 16, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Dallas Market Hall **MAIN** - Dallas, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2315 2387 - 2189
5 - 8 1941 2019 - 1864
9 - 16 1685 1874 - 1485
17 - 26 1138 1492 - 815

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kwon, Hannah Sabio Fencing Academy D24 2387 2127.83
2 Xiao, Cindy Lone Star Fencing Center D24 2364 2103.29
3 Ku, Alathea-Joy Globus Fencing Academy D24 2320 2068.38
4 Luker, Hannah Lone Star Fencing Center C24 2189 1929.74
5 Xu, Kaylyn Lone Star Fencing Center D24 2019 1724.35
6 Moon, Claire Sabio Fencing Academy E24 1949 1674.50
7 Reavis, Isabel Lone Star Fencing Center D24 1933 1638.60
8 Cheron, Helene Globus Fencing Academy E24 1864 1598.23
9 Cai, Veronica Laguna Fencing Center E24 1837 1575.65
10 Nguyen, Madeleine Lone Star Fencing Center E24 1831 1524.80
11 Mallampati, Jaabili Frisco Fencing Academy E24 1874 1521.66
12 Suhalim, Maree Globus Fencing Academy E23 1734 1317.12
13 Joshi, Samika Frisco Fencing Academy E24 1618 1306.72
14 Kim, Grace Globus Fencing Academy U 1592 1264.18
15 Witek, Isabelle Globus Fencing Academy U 1508 1106.70
16 LU, QIWEN Lone Star Fencing Center U 1485 1105.07
17 Barboriak, Emily Nova Fencing Club U 1492 1049.01
18 Bangalore, Shriya Frisco Fencing Academy U 1279 840.77
19 Cha, Jungyun Sabio Fencing Academy U 1430 825.29
20 Seo, Yunseo Sabio Fencing Academy U 1312 770.27
21 Ham, Elizabeth Globus Fencing Academy E24 1221 741.53
22 Oh, Chloe Globus Fencing Academy U 1025 553.79
23 Sampath, Medha Premier Fencing Academy U 1051 501.55
24 Gillentine, Madelyn Globus Fencing Academy U 916 384.72
25 Jude, Simona Texas Sabre Academy U 815 251.34
26 Foisset, Camille Frisco Fencing Academy U 844 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!