Duel in Dallas ROC/RJCC/RYC

Junior Women’s Saber (JNRWS)

Saturday, November 16, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Register

Dallas Market Hall **MAIN** - Dallas, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2304 2450 - 2129
5 - 8 1992 2093 - 1923
9 - 16 1700 1874 - 1568
17 - 26 1217 1492 - 784

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kwon, Hannah Sabio Fencing Academy D24 2450 2198.52
2 Xiao, Cindy Lone Star Fencing Center D24 2348 2087.20
3 Ku, Alathea-Joy Globus Fencing Academy D24 2291 2040.45
4 Luker, Hannah Lone Star Fencing Center C24 2129 1873.14
5 Moon, Claire Sabio Fencing Academy E24 2093 1836.18
6 Xu, Kaylyn Lone Star Fencing Center D24 2019 1724.35
7 Cheron, Helene Globus Fencing Academy E24 1923 1661.03
8 Reavis, Isabel Lone Star Fencing Center D24 1933 1638.60
9 Cai, Veronica Laguna Fencing Center E24 1829 1571.36
10 Nguyen, Madeleine Lone Star Fencing Center E24 1831 1524.80
11 Mallampati, Jaabili Frisco Fencing Academy E24 1874 1521.66
12 Joshi, Samika Frisco Fencing Academy E24 1614 1324.79
13 Suhalim, Maree Globus Fencing Academy E23 1734 1317.12
14 Kim, Grace Globus Fencing Academy U 1568 1256.60
15 LU, QIWEN Lone Star Fencing Center U 1572 1244.94
16 Witek, Isabelle Globus Fencing Academy U 1578 1209.79
17 Oh, Chloe Globus Fencing Academy U 1469 1166.24
18 Barboriak, Emily Nova Fencing Club U 1492 1049.01
19 Cha, Jungyun Sabio Fencing Academy U 1473 1007.93
20 Ham, Elizabeth Globus Fencing Academy E24 1390 997.72
21 Seo, Yunseo Sabio Fencing Academy U 1317 982.59
22 Bangalore, Shriya Frisco Fencing Academy U 1321 896.38
23 Gillentine, Madelyn Globus Fencing Academy U 1058 616.96
24 Sampath, Medha Premier Fencing Academy U 1051 501.55
25 Jude, Simona Texas Sabre Academy U 815 251.34
26 Foisset, Camille Frisco Fencing Academy U 784 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!