Duel in Dallas ROC/RJCC/RYC

Youth 12 Men’s Saber (Y12MS)

Sunday, November 17, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

Dallas Market Hall **MAIN** - Dallas, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2043 2365 - 1705
5 - 8 1633 1683 - 1591
9 - 16 1320 1459 - 1183
17 - 28 943 1202 - 636

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 YU, BOWEN Lone Star Fencing Center D24 2365 2111.01
2 Yu, Ian Lone Star Fencing Center U 2111 1852.59
3 Salman, Ibrahim Globus Fencing Academy U 1990 1693.73
4 Kamura, Kosei Globus Fencing Academy U 1705 1382.22
5 Lu, Simon Lone Star Fencing Center U 1683 1376.18
6 Shankar, Rahm Sabio Fencing Academy U 1649 1324.68
7 Zhang, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1591 1284.14
8 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1608 1181.18
9 Liu, Dylan Globus Fencing Academy U 1388 843.88
10 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1225 795.45
11 Chen, Harrison Globus Fencing Academy U 1401 766.92
12 Kim, Dylan Globus Fencing Academy U 1244 739.20
13 Huang, Joshua Globus Fencing Academy U 1459 687.49
14 Shen, Alaric Sabio Fencing Academy U 1223 595.37
15 Cai, Limo Texas Sabre Academy U 1437 587.30
16 Liu, Andy Globus Fencing Academy U 1183 531.80
17 Cao, Osmond Globus Fencing Academy U 986 428.97
18 Scott, Clark Globus Fencing Academy U 1202 424.77
19 Yu, Hyunseung Globus Fencing Academy U 1035 327.70
20 Kang, Nathan Lone Star Fencing Center U 954 314.27
21 Balagopal, Aditya Frisco Fencing Academy U 916 220.92
22 Qiu, Lucas Unattached U 941 102.63
23 Chidambaram, Nivedh Sabio Fencing Academy U 636 53.09
24 Wang, Yixin Sabio Fencing Academy U 1189 21.64
25 Park, Seojun Globus Fencing Academy U 1060 < 0
26 Choi, Clayton Globus Fencing Academy U 875 < 0
27 Yu, Huibin Lone Star Fencing Center U 691 < 0
28 Grover, Sebastian Globus Fencing Academy U 829 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!