Duel in Dallas ROC/RJCC/RYC

Youth 12 Men’s Saber (Y12MS)

Sunday, November 17, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

Dallas Market Hall **MAIN** - Dallas, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2033 2370 - 1713
5 - 8 1638 1714 - 1498
9 - 16 1268 1459 - 1025
17 - 28 949 1189 - 639

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 YU, BOWEN Lone Star Fencing Center D24 2370 2116.40
2 Yu, Ian Lone Star Fencing Center U 2133 1877.14
3 Salman, Ibrahim Globus Fencing Academy U 1917 1634.21
4 Zhang, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1713 1437.25
5 Lu, Simon Lone Star Fencing Center U 1714 1436.53
6 Shankar, Rahm Sabio Fencing Academy U 1693 1409.32
7 Kamura, Kosei Globus Fencing Academy U 1648 1349.97
8 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1498 1121.84
9 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1322 934.43
10 Liu, Dylan Globus Fencing Academy U 1352 873.45
11 Chen, Harrison Globus Fencing Academy U 1310 817.21
12 Kim, Dylan Globus Fencing Academy U 1244 739.20
13 Huang, Joshua Globus Fencing Academy U 1459 687.49
14 Cai, Limo Texas Sabre Academy U 1277 662.16
15 Shen, Alaric Sabio Fencing Academy U 1152 588.40
16 Cao, Osmond Globus Fencing Academy U 1025 567.75
17 Liu, Andy Globus Fencing Academy U 1139 557.70
18 Scott, Clark Globus Fencing Academy U 1152 549.07
19 Yu, Hyunseung Globus Fencing Academy U 1105 511.55
20 Kang, Nathan Lone Star Fencing Center U 1067 502.86
21 Balagopal, Aditya Frisco Fencing Academy U 1019 484.57
22 Chidambaram, Nivedh Sabio Fencing Academy U 866 385.31
23 Park, Seojun Globus Fencing Academy U 1002 105.26
24 Choi, Clayton Globus Fencing Academy U 803 56.83
25 Wang, Yixin Sabio Fencing Academy U 1189 21.64
26 Qiu, Lucas Unattached U 713 9.75
27 Yu, Huibin Lone Star Fencing Center U 691 < 0
28 Grover, Sebastian Globus Fencing Academy U 639 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!