Duel in Dallas ROC/RJCC/RYC

Youth 12 Men’s Saber (Y12MS)

Sunday, November 17, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

Dallas Market Hall **MAIN** - Dallas, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2032 2346 - 1834
5 - 8 1668 1804 - 1481
9 - 16 1312 1459 - 1085
17 - 28 962 1189 - 581

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 YU, BOWEN Lone Star Fencing Center D24 2346 2092.37
2 Yu, Ian Lone Star Fencing Center U 2102 1847.21
3 Salman, Ibrahim Globus Fencing Academy U 1847 1575.74
4 Lu, Simon Lone Star Fencing Center U 1834 1570.50
5 Shankar, Rahm Sabio Fencing Academy U 1804 1533.96
6 Zhang, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1693 1426.93
7 Kamura, Kosei Globus Fencing Academy U 1692 1401.42
8 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1481 1136.11
9 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1358 1005.31
10 Chen, Harrison Globus Fencing Academy U 1427 993.75
11 Liu, Dylan Globus Fencing Academy U 1346 895.63
12 Cai, Limo Texas Sabre Academy U 1363 805.85
13 Kim, Dylan Globus Fencing Academy U 1244 739.20
14 Huang, Joshua Globus Fencing Academy U 1459 687.49
15 Scott, Clark Globus Fencing Academy U 1214 650.66
16 Balagopal, Aditya Frisco Fencing Academy U 1085 593.80
17 Liu, Andy Globus Fencing Academy U 1118 574.29
18 Cao, Osmond Globus Fencing Academy U 1025 567.75
19 Shen, Alaric Sabio Fencing Academy U 1065 559.87
20 Chidambaram, Nivedh Sabio Fencing Academy U 981 554.38
21 Yu, Hyunseung Globus Fencing Academy U 1105 511.55
22 Kang, Nathan Lone Star Fencing Center U 1030 485.73
23 Choi, Clayton Globus Fencing Academy U 954 316.48
24 Qiu, Lucas Unattached U 805 141.58
25 Park, Seojun Globus Fencing Academy U 1002 105.26
26 Wang, Yixin Sabio Fencing Academy U 1189 21.64
27 Yu, Huibin Lone Star Fencing Center U 691 < 0
28 Grover, Sebastian Globus Fencing Academy U 581 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!