Duel in Dallas ROC/RJCC/RYC

Youth 12 Men’s Saber (Y12MS)

Sunday, November 17, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

Dallas Market Hall **MAIN** - Dallas, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2038 2370 - 1693
5 - 8 1616 1671 - 1572
9 - 16 1303 1459 - 1150
17 - 28 940 1225 - 630

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 YU, BOWEN Lone Star Fencing Center D24 2370 2116.40
2 Yu, Ian Lone Star Fencing Center U 2133 1877.14
3 Salman, Ibrahim Globus Fencing Academy U 1956 1664.85
4 Lu, Simon Lone Star Fencing Center U 1693 1390.58
5 Kamura, Kosei Globus Fencing Academy U 1671 1361.96
6 Shankar, Rahm Sabio Fencing Academy U 1626 1308.91
7 Zhang, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1572 1270.03
8 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1596 1188.35
9 Liu, Dylan Globus Fencing Academy U 1458 955.26
10 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1259 848.58
11 Kim, Dylan Globus Fencing Academy U 1244 739.20
12 Chen, Harrison Globus Fencing Academy U 1328 728.11
13 Huang, Joshua Globus Fencing Academy U 1459 687.49
14 Cai, Limo Texas Sabre Academy U 1367 606.58
15 Shen, Alaric Sabio Fencing Academy U 1158 552.06
16 Liu, Andy Globus Fencing Academy U 1150 517.01
17 Scott, Clark Globus Fencing Academy U 1225 508.93
18 Cao, Osmond Globus Fencing Academy U 973 445.48
19 Yu, Hyunseung Globus Fencing Academy U 1112 440.46
20 Kang, Nathan Lone Star Fencing Center U 1005 401.91
21 Balagopal, Aditya Frisco Fencing Academy U 945 300.68
22 Qiu, Lucas Unattached U 827 55.94
23 Chidambaram, Nivedh Sabio Fencing Academy U 630 51.77
24 Wang, Yixin Sabio Fencing Academy U 1189 21.64
25 Park, Seojun Globus Fencing Academy U 1060 < 0
26 Choi, Clayton Globus Fencing Academy U 795 < 0
27 Yu, Huibin Lone Star Fencing Center U 691 < 0
28 Grover, Sebastian Globus Fencing Academy U 829 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!