Duel in Dallas ROC/RJCC/RYC

Youth 12 Men’s Saber (Y12MS)

Sunday, November 17, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

Dallas Market Hall **MAIN** - Dallas, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2051 2354 - 1706
5 - 8 1633 1679 - 1573
9 - 16 1358 1459 - 1223
17 - 28 950 1189 - 661

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 YU, BOWEN Lone Star Fencing Center D24 2354 2099.95
2 Yu, Ian Lone Star Fencing Center U 2126 1866.83
3 Salman, Ibrahim Globus Fencing Academy U 2018 1714.19
4 Kamura, Kosei Globus Fencing Academy U 1706 1369.23
5 Lu, Simon Lone Star Fencing Center U 1673 1363.38
6 Shankar, Rahm Sabio Fencing Academy U 1607 1273.97
7 Zhang, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1573 1255.30
8 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1679 1225.78
9 Liu, Dylan Globus Fencing Academy U 1388 843.88
10 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1248 796.11
11 Chen, Harrison Globus Fencing Academy U 1401 766.92
12 Kim, Dylan Globus Fencing Academy U 1289 765.27
13 Huang, Joshua Globus Fencing Academy U 1459 687.49
14 Shen, Alaric Sabio Fencing Academy U 1223 595.37
15 Cai, Limo Texas Sabre Academy U 1437 587.30
16 Scott, Clark Globus Fencing Academy U 1420 521.14
17 Cao, Osmond Globus Fencing Academy U 1003 436.97
18 Yu, Hyunseung Globus Fencing Academy U 1035 327.70
19 Kang, Nathan Lone Star Fencing Center U 954 314.27
20 Liu, Andy Globus Fencing Academy U 1064 312.97
21 Balagopal, Aditya Frisco Fencing Academy U 916 220.92
22 Qiu, Lucas Unattached U 1034 144.71
23 Chidambaram, Nivedh Sabio Fencing Academy U 661 62.05
24 Wang, Yixin Sabio Fencing Academy U 1189 21.64
25 Park, Seojun Globus Fencing Academy U 1060 < 0
26 Choi, Clayton Globus Fencing Academy U 964 < 0
27 Yu, Huibin Lone Star Fencing Center U 691 < 0
28 Grover, Sebastian Globus Fencing Academy U 829 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!