Motor City SYC/RCC

Youth 10 Women’s Foil (Y10WF)

Friday, February 28, 2025 at 11:00 AM

Register

Elite Sportsplex - Waterford, MI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1596 1623 - 1550
5 - 8 1394 1472 - 1330
9 - 16 1439 1999 - 1183
17 - 28 1278 2500 - 739

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Zhang, Selina Renaissance Fencing Club U 1623 1326.30
2 Khetpal, Aalia Invicta Sports U 1611 1241.83
3 Wang, Christina Renaissance Fencing Club U 1601 1241.68
4 Kim, Yuna Renaissance Fencing Club U 1550 1167.87
5 Pak, Emmalyn Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 1472 1090.17
6 Ju, Victoria V Fencing Club U 1381 1075.29
7 Farooqi, Eliora Renaissance Fencing Club U 1391 977.35
8 Kagan, Natalie Eminence Fencing Academy U 1330 936.66
9 Paek, Ellie Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 1307 914.55
10 Jones, Parker Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 1533 908.14
11 Welter, Gemma Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1430 897.75
12 Smart, Athena U 1999 856.41
13 Chen, Yinuo U 1481 855.81
14 Li, Annabelle Orange County International Fencers Club U 1261 843.49
15 Fang, Savannah Renaissance Fencing Club U 1183 803.91
16 Chan, Hailey U 1317 791.32
17 Shi, Cathy Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 1244 721.74
18 Yang, Stella Axis Fencing Club U 1529 569.52
19 Ho, Avery Space City Fencing Academy U 1176 525.00
20 Jiang, Mujing Renaissance Fencing Club U 1170 518.29
21 Lee, Isabella Yuen Axis Fencing Club U 1657 424.06
22 Gong, Maggie Columbus International Fencing Academy U 934 375.07
23 West, Mira Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. U 739 124.34
24 Kanasz, Peyton Cleveland Fencing Academy East LLC U 2500 < 0
25 Camellini, Emily Bluegrass Fencers' Club U 939 < 0
26 Ganocy, Sloane Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 988 < 0
27 Jagannathan, Aria Renaissance Fencing Club U 1481 < 0
28 Huang, Rosalyn Renaissance Fencing Club U 980 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!