Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PALMER Kristen E. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | CANNON Sophia E. | D V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | KATZ Anat | V V D D V D | V V V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 3 | CHIOLDI Mina | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 5 | SATHYANATH Kailing | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 6 | TAO Hannah J. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | TIBURCIO Diana | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 8 | YURT Leyla | V D V D V D | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 9 | KOO Samantha | V V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 11 | EDGINGTON Grace | D V V V D V | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 12 | PARRIS Gillian A. | D D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 13 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | V D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 14 | LEVITIS Danielle | D D V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | MEIEROVICH Sophie | D D D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 16 | LU Yi Lin | D D D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 17 | DANIELS Erica | V V V V D V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 18 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | V D V V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | TURNOF Kayla M. | V V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 20 | BAKER Audrey C. | V D V D V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 21 | KUZNETSOVA Nastassja | V V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 22 | FAY Zoe A. | D V V V V D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 23 | LOCKETT Audrey | V D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 24 | BIENVENU Camille C. | V D D V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 25 | ZHANG Judy | V V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 26 | RODGERS Sally E. | V D D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | BINSTOCK Mari I. | D D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | D V D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 29 | HUANG Sharon | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 30 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | D V D D D D | V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 31 | CHIANG Emily | D D V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 32 | GIRARDI Aemilia | D D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 33 | LIGH Karis | D D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 34 | SU Emma | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 35 | MEDVEDEVA Alexandra | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.