Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
2 | SINHA Anika | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
3 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% | |
3 | KIM Marley I. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
5 | HILD Nisha | - | - | 4% | 19% | 45% | 32% | |
6 | PASHIN Anna | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
7 | LEE Sophia | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 9% | |
8 | FESTA Carina | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
9 | LU Elaine | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
10 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
11 | LI Sophie | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 41% | 17% | 2% |
12 | DUCKETT Madison | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 46% | 24% | |
13 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
14 | NG Sarah W. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
15 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
16 | GUILFOYLE Alanna | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
17 | NATH Trisha | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
18 | MCKEE Ainsley | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
19 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 43% | 13% |
20 | NAYAK Esha | 16% | 46% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
21 | DUBE Naomi | 18% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
22 | STRIZHEVSKY Ariel | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
23 | KIM Sydney | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
24 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
25 | YU Abriella R. | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
26 | YU Enya | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% | |
27 | WANG Audrey | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
28 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 5% | |
29 | DONG Angel | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
30 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
31 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
32 | VIME-OLIVE Maya E. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
33 | KUMAR Shreesa | 5% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
35 | PRADO-TUCKER Isabel | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
36 | KAPLAN Gabriela | 21% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
36 | NGUYEN Talia | 8% | 39% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.