Sportsplex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
| 2 | HU Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | |
| 3 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
| 3 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | |
| 5 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | |
| 6 | BRANDT Jaden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
| 7 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 8 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 9 | UEMOTO Ken | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 6% |
| 10 | ZHENG LEON | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | |
| 11 | BONETTI Brayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
| 12 | DEELY Hartigan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 13 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 8% | |
| 14 | LEE Anderson | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 4% | |
| 15 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 23% | 3% | |
| 16 | ORAL Derin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 18% | |
| 18 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 19 | WITCZAK Mateus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% | |
| 20 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 21 | CHEN Ryan | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 22 | DE SIENA Salvatore | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 23 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 8% | |
| 24 | VAHABZADEH Jake R. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | 17% | 2% | |
| 26 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 9% | |
| 27 | NOVOSYOLOK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 6% | |
| 28 | LASKOW Max | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | - |
| 29 | MATTOO Deven | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | ZHANG Emmanuel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 29% | 4% | |
| 32 | BALE ATMAN | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 33 | ANNUNZIATA Ciro | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | DIGIACOMO Dennis G. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% | 1% | |
| 35 | KENNEDY Tomás | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 100% | 88% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | KONG Alan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% | |
| 38 | GAO Kai | 100% | 79% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 21% | 2% | |
| 40 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
| 41 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 100% | 54% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | GOMEZ Emilio | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 44 | SINHA Ishaan | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | JIN Louis | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 47 | CAFFREY Ethan | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 48 | JIANG Terence | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | SCHIMEL Luke | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | ANNUNZIATA Paolo | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 51 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 68% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | MONELL Franics (Frank) | 100% | 80% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | MILLER Isaac | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 55 | LIU Alexander | 100% | 85% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.