Sportsplex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RIZKALA Joanna | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 46% | |
2 | LIU Yifei | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
3 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 45% | 16% | |
3 | MUND Ruth | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
5 | ZHANG Sophie | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
6 | SINHA Anika | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
7 | FESTA Carina | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
8 | YEN Natalie | 5% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
9 | FEIG Sela | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
10 | KANDADAI Lara | 7% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
11 | DANK Dina | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
12 | ZHENG Valentina | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
13 | HENRY Soraya S. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
14 | ZHENG Sophia | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | |
15 | ATTIA Jasmine | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
16 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | - | 14% | 42% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
17 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
18 | DAI Olivia | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
19 | BAWA Anahat | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
20 | NGUYEN Ella | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
21 | LAGOON Miriam | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
22 | YOUNG Audrey | 5% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
23 | KHAN Alissa | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | |
24 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
25 | REN Xinling | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
26 | GONTARSKI Rachel | 14% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
27 | NAYAK Esha | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
28 | NAYAK Anika | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
29 | ZHANG Emily | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
30 | LOO Kaitlyn | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
31 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
32 | MCSWEENEY Kylie | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
33 | LI Alexis | 2% | 40% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | |
34 | SHUM Cindy | 1% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
35 | FLATT Sophia | - | 7% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 2% | |
36 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | - | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
37 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
38 | MANKOVA Varvara | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
39 | CRAINE Alexandra E. | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
40 | ZENG Sarah | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | |
41 | SHELLEY Scarlett | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
42 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
43 | XU Demi | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
44 | CONNOLLY Vida | 2% | 19% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
44 | NAYAK Antara | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
46 | MORGAN Lily | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.