January NAC

Veteran 60-69 Women’s Saber (V60WS)

Friday, January 3, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Register

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3012 3480 - 2556
5 - 8 2484 2537 - 2441
9 - 16 2204 2479 - 1932
17 - 25 1411 1890 - 829

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Pernice, Robin Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. B24 3480 3005.71
2 Fabry, Lydia Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) B24 3193 2677.16
3 Jerkins, Jayne Capital Fencing Academy C22 2817 2360.63
4 Shinn-Cunningham, Barbara Corsair Fencing School C23 2556 2232.16
5 Vance, Beth Renaissance Fencing Club B23 2537 2219.32
6 Gluck, Myriam Columbus International Fencing Academy C22 2506 2209.63
7 Yang, Jenny Nellya Fencers C24 2441 2144.40
8 Kim, Nam Heui Cambridge Fencing Center C23 2454 2101.26
9 Klein-Braddock, Kimberly Oregon Fencing Alliance C22 2479 1923.98
10 King, Robin Salle Auriol Seattle C24 2237 1917.58
11 Freyre, Rebecca Fencing Academy Of Denver C24 2234 1871.64
12 Randall, Cathleen Coyle Forge Fencing Teams DUR C21 2224 1867.40
13 Starr, Cynthia Manhattan Fencing Center D23 2245 1813.43
14 Gordon, Sharon Manhattan Fencing Center E24 2115 1760.59
15 Alzona, Esperanza Nazlymov Fencing Foundation D23 2170 1677.70
16 Oishi, Yoko PDX Fencing E23 1932 1434.33
17 Schlienger, Katia Manhattan Fencing Center E23 1890 1270.57
18 Degen, Anita Salle Auriol Seattle U 1574 1142.18
19 Walter, Joanne Stoccata Fencing Academy & Club U 1485 949.22
20 Harris, Lynn Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1558 911.68
21 Hearne, Rosa Atlantic Fencing Academy U 1453 870.10
22 Chriss, Rhonda Hangtown Saber Club U 1238 642.08
23 Mohr, Carol Columbus International Fencing Academy U 1424 360.61
24 Rowland, May U 1249 275.22
25 Moro, Diana Delaware Valley Fencers Club-PA U 829 68.98

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!