January NAC

Veteran 50-59 Women’s Epee (V50WE)

Saturday, January 4, 2025 at 1:00 PM

Register

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3175 3217 - 3079
5 - 8 2765 2825 - 2683
9 - 16 2588 3052 - 2158
17 - 27 1813 2282 - 1371

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Marchant, Sandra Rogue Fencing Academy A24 3212 2943.33
2 Foellmer, Kristin DC Fencers Club A25 3192 2881.19
3 Exum, Monica Salle Auriol Seattle A24 3217 2868.86
4 Totemeier, Ann Northern Colorado Fencers A24 3079 2769.53
5 Chang, Heidi Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) B25 2824 2443.79
6 Wolf, Lisa Riverside Fencing Club B24 2727 2442.02
7 Schmid, Carola Salle Auriol Seattle B24 2683 2409.51
8 Chernis, Sabina Alliance Fencing Academy B25 2825 2348.98
9 Carter, Jane Marx Fencing Academy B24 2986 2347.46
10 Chimienti, Michele No Fear Fencing C24 2545 2195.45
11 Carey, Michele Bozeman Fencing Association, LLC C25 2375 2060.56
12 Bélanger, Marie-Claire B25 3052 2037.17
13 Sanchez-Emden, Marta South Florida Fencing Club C22 2387 1999.88
14 Huzel, Lisa Canadian Fencing Acadamy D23 2452 1963.34
15 Lapp, Laurie Traverse City Fencing Club B21 2747 1927.93
16 Byron, Karen Arena Fencing Academy LLC B23 2158 1880.65
17 Woundy, Melissa Rogue Fencing Academy E24 2282 1854.93
18 Paine, Cheryl Red Door Fencing C22 2201 1771.07
19 Swenson, Alexandra Ataba Fencing Club C23 2123 1757.88
20 Bowen, Victoria Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) D22 2195 1719.98
21 Felsenheld, Donna Nova Fencing Club E25 1870 1312.56
22 Nollner, Jennifer Wasatch Fencing E23 1581 1150.41
23 Blasko, Judit U 1547 959.04
24 Ontiveros, Sara Olympia Fencing Center U 1815 939.38
25 Osterbauer, Nancy Salisbury Fencing Club U 1529 715.90
26 Seto, Karen Rogue Fencing Academy E24 1426 570.01
27 Toby, Charmaine ArtDu Fencing U 1371 337.08

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!