January NAC

Veteran 50-59 Men’s Saber (V50MS)

Saturday, January 4, 2025 at 2:30 PM

Register

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3579 3956 - 3237
5 - 8 3160 3236 - 3114
9 - 16 2436 2972 - 2058
17 - 26 1991 2500 - 1318

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Thornton, Ronald Capital Fencing Academy A24 3620 3284.53
2 CHOI, ILHO Boston Fencing Club A23 3956 3104.60
3 Makogon, Sergey Triple Threat Fencing Academy A21 3502 3052.13
4 Phillips, Kim Zeta Fencing A24 3237 2845.42
5 Bacon, Michael Manhattan Fencing Center B24 3167 2843.90
6 Chu, Kevin Fencers Club Inc. A24 3125 2759.00
7 Penton, Robert Triple Threat Fencing Academy C24 3114 2698.88
8 Bush, Joshua Lincoln Fencing Club C23 3236 2638.23
9 Escueta, Antonio Globus Fencing Academy B24 2669 2383.50
10 Dolegiewicz, Mariusz Midwest Fencing Club B23 2730 2175.19
11 Krasowitz, Jason Central Pennsylvania Fencing Association C21 2972 1999.29
12 Samotessov, Vladislav Infinity Fencing Alliance C24 2309 1945.07
13 Zoller, Matthew Fencing Academy Of Denver B24 2254 1911.89
14 colter, richard Denver Fencing Center C24 2343 1838.79
15 Dudnick, Christian Fencing Academy Of Denver C24 2058 1694.37
16 Margil, David Zeta Fencing E22 2151 1563.51
17 Cho, Yutong Fencers Club Inc. C24 2160 1544.48
18 Martinez, Mario Cardinal Fencing Club E23 1886 1528.72
19 Bartlett, Jonathan New York Athletic Club D24 2192 1495.68
20 Anderson, Nathan Denver Fencing Center C23 2186 1493.83
21 Meehan, Justin Orion Fencing C21 2092 1409.65
22 Park, James Phoenix Fencing Academy B24 1983 1391.40
23 Cogan, Derek Spartak E24 2127 1285.25
24 dhar, asif Capital Fencing Academy U 1318 575.63
25 Ku, Raymond Cleveland Fencing Academy East LLC E24 1470 533.36
26 Maurin, Michael Valkyrie Fencing Club U 2500 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!