Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
2 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
3 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
3 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 22% | |
5 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
6 | DUCKETT Madison | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
7 | HUANG Sharon | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
8 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 25% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
9 | DAVIS Jordan | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - | |
10 | CHIANG Emily | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
11 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
12 | HILD Nisha | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% | |
13 | PASHIN Anna | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | |
14 | NEIBART Fiona | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - | |
15 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
16 | SU Emma | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
17 | PROCACCINI Ashten V. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% | |
18 | SINHA Anika | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
19 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | |
20 | NG Sarah W. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
21 | GRINBERG Aliya | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
22 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
23 | SHIH Christina | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
24 | LEE Sophia | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
25 | LU Elaine | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
26 | SIMONIAN Olivia A. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - | |
27 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
28 | KOTSEN Ava L. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | |
29 | JENKINS Scotland | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
30 | NGUYEN Ella | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
31 | CHAGARES Sarah M. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
32 | CHIANG Sydney | 12% | 39% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
33 | OBRADOVIC Ana | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% | |
34 | JAVERI Amaya | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
35 | MCKEE Ainsley | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
36 | KASTENMEIER Elizabeth | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
37 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | |
38 | WANG Audrey | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | NAYAK Esha | 35% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - | |
40 | CRUZ Sonia | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - | |
41 | LITVAK-HINENZON Michaela | 50% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - | |
43 | NAYAK Anika | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.