Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ROY Layla | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 15% |
| 2 | SU Michelle | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
| 3 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 31% |
| 3 | KOKES Gwendolen | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 5 | FU Qihan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 40% | 10% |
| 5 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 7 | LI Rachel Y. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 8 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 9 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
| 10 | WANG Yudi | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 11 | GU Emily | - | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 12 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 13 | HOU Wendong | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | WU Celine | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 15 | QIAN Jade | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 16 | KAPUSTINA Arina | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 18 | LIN Victoria T. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% |
| 19 | JONES Jenna | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 20 | WANG Jasmine | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 21 | KOGAN Alexis | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 22 | SHA Yi Ling | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | TANG Sophia | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | KUTTIKAT Sanjana | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | CHENG Angelina | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 26 | ZHOU Sophia | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | CHARALEL Jessica | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | < 1% | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 30 | ZHU Elise | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 31 | GAO Anna | 20% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 33 | SHIM Grace | 7% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | OCAK Yasemin | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 35 | ZHAO Hanna | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 36 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | PARK Jacqueline | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | UNGERER Frieda | 16% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | WALOR Riley H. | 29% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 40 | BADLANI Diya | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | FORNES Jolie A. | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.