Durham, NC - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 2 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 3 | OLSEN Natalie J. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 3 | CHANG Emily | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 5 | LIAO Siwen | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 6 | TUCKER Iman R. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 14% | |
| 7 | WU Erica L. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 8 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 9 | DHAR Aamina | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 10 | MENKE Kavya I. | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | BENTOLILA Yedida | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 12 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% | |
| 13 | SHI Cathleen | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 6% | |
| 14 | BAKER Amelia M. | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 16 | CONGIUSTA Aelex | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 17 | CHEN Xinyan | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 18 | NI Sharon | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 19 | YANG Yutong | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | LU Amy | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | STEVENS Katherine | 3% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | |
| 22 | TODD Phoebe | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | ELDER Rhiannon C. | 13% | 40% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | PAL Anjali G. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | - | |
| 25 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.