French Field House - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MYRONIUK Dariia | - | - | - | - | 9% | 45% | 45% |
2 | LEE Alina | - | - | - | - | 3% | 42% | 54% |
3 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 23% |
3 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | - | - | - | 7% | 45% | 41% | 7% |
5 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 61% |
6 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 53% | 21% | 2% |
7 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% |
8 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | - | 3% | 51% | 39% | 7% |
9 | KORABLINA Aleksandra | - | - | - | - | 8% | 56% | 35% |
10 | ZHAO Sophie L. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 32% | 6% |
11 | MANCINI Ludovica | - | - | - | - | 9% | 47% | 44% |
12 | ANDREYENKA Yana | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 29% |
13 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
14 | VIANNA Gabriella | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
15 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 50% | 32% |
16 | ANDREYENKA Hanna | - | - | - | - | 20% | 53% | 27% |
17 | HALL Velma | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 46% | 11% |
18 | AYUPOVA Ameliya | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 44% | 6% | - |
19 | PHILLIPS Hattie | - | 10% | 40% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
20 | HENDRIAN Rachel M. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
21 | HIRSCH Alyssa J. | - | 2% | 22% | 59% | 15% | 1% | - |
22 | BAWA Sahana | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
23 | BASSIK Eva | 1% | 15% | 47% | 36% | 1% | - | - |
24 | MUSTO Isabella | 2% | 17% | 47% | 33% | 1% | - | - |
25 | ZHANG Rongrui | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | DE LAPEROUSE Nina | 40% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
27 | LEE Fiona E. | - | 4% | 26% | 47% | 21% | 1% | - |
28 | ZHUANG Sophie | - | 8% | 42% | 41% | 8% | - | - |
29 | HEISER Anna M. | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
30 | ROMANO Megan C. | 8% | 53% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
31 | KELBLEY Newt J. | 3% | 21% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
32 | GUILLEN Mikaela | 24% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
33 | LEE Claire L. | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
34 | YASUZAWA Abby | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
35 | TIERNEY Eleanor | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
36 | PARA Akshaya | 59% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
37 | EUH Jayme | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
38 | LEMASTERS Elise M. | 22% | 52% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
39 | LUU Tristan | 6% | 35% | 53% | 6% | - | - | - |
40 | ANTAL Chandini | 17% | 56% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
41 | LONGO Gabriella | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
41 | MCINTYRE Sydney | 15% | 43% | 35% | 7% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.