French Field House - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SWARTZ Roscoe O. | - | - | - | 1% | 20% | 78% | |
| 2 | MAROUF Eyad | - | - | - | 5% | 34% | 61% | |
| 3 | PRICE Jack S. | - | - | 1% | 15% | 61% | 23% | |
| 3 | RAI Avin | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% | |
| 5 | RIGHTLER Samuel | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 41% | 11% | |
| 6 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 36% | 59% |
| 7 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% | |
| 8 | ALOJIPAN Jaydon | 2% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 9 | HANEY Vincent | - | 1% | 10% | 46% | 40% | 4% | |
| 10 | AL-NASSER Mahmoud | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% | |
| 11 | LIU Kelly | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 45% | 40% |
| 12 | DRESSELL Wiley | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 52% | 18% |
| 13 | RICHER Tyler | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 14 | LAI Yat Hay Casper | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 47% | 25% |
| 15 | SCHARDINE Ryan | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 46% | 17% | 1% |
| 16 | CHOU Stephen C. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 66% | 20% | |
| 17 | LIU Yizhe | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 18 | BAUER Hank E. | - | 6% | 34% | 52% | 7% | - | |
| 19 | DAUM Alan | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 20 | FISIC Vasilije | - | 1% | 11% | 45% | 39% | 4% | |
| 21 | SCHARDINE James | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 2% | |
| 22 | AKS Ari | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | XIONG Zerui | 3% | 23% | 50% | 23% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | GERSTMANN Max T. | 5% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | SIDDIQUI Shayan | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 26 | NGUYENBA Thaison | 20% | 44% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 27 | BARNES William | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | WALTERS Elijah | 14% | 46% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | LI Feiting | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | BATTISFORE Hunter | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | STANISLAV Charles | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | AHMED Neehal | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | CHEN Curtis | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 34 | IDRIS Haashir | 38% | 47% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | GRAY-JONES Jimmy | 3% | 29% | 43% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | HANEY Zachary | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | PHAM Minh Phuc | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | BLOOM Jacob | 29% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | PHILLIPSON Jack | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | BAILEY Conner | 9% | 36% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | JI Eric | 3% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | DUDZIK Garrett | 12% | 57% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | HUGHES Nathan | 1% | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 44 | CHEN Benson | 12% | 44% | 40% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.