Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | KIM Minwook | V V D V V | V V V V V V | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
2 | KIM Avery J. | D V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
3 | CHIEN Phillip L. | V D D V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
3 | TAKEMARU Leo | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
5 | LILOV Neil | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
6 | CHAN Matthew | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
7 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
8 | LASORSA Matthew | V V D D V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
9 | LEVIN Mark A. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
10 | LIN William | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
11 | VAULES Charles W. | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
12 | YAO Jonathan | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
12 | PARK Collin D. | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
14 | QUAN Nicholas | V V D V D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
15 | BOHRA Rohan | D V D V D V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
16 | GHOSH Tuhin | V V D D D | V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
17 | GANTA Vijay | V V V V V V | D | 2.0 | 6 | +4.0 |
18 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
19 | LAU Jeremy Y. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
20 | CHO Brandon | V V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
21 | LUO ZiRui | V V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
22 | KEEFE Duncan | V V V D V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
23 | MURTHY Mukund | V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
24 | CHAN Daniel | V D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
25 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | D D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
26 | GILLIGAN Wolff | D V V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
27 | HUANG Ethan F. | D V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
28 | YUAN Kevin | V D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
29 | WONG Ryan | V V V D D D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
30 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | D D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
31 | D'ORAZIO Joseph | D V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
32 | WU Wilmund | D V V D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
33 | HO Kaden M. | D D V V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
34 | GINIS Nathan | D V V D D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
35 | SMITH David C. | V D V D V D | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
36 | RYAN Edward T. | V D V V D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
37 | HAN Daniel Y. | D V D V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
38 | CHERNAEV Aleksandar | D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
39 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
40 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
41 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
42 | LIU Kelly | D D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
43 | BOURGHOL Matthew | V D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
44 | GOLD Jackson | V D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
45 | DEWEY Charles J. | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
46 | LEE Jude H. | D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
47 | KOGAN Benjamin | D V D D D D | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
48 | SANDERS Samuel B. | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
49 | GEORGE Daniel | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
50 | BURDAN Gabriel | D D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
51 | DUNAL Daniel | D D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
52 | MOULTON Ian | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
53 | HUANG Tyler T. | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
54 | PENTLAND Craig | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
55 | LIN Stephen | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
55 | GARCIA Ryan | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
57 | HONG Justin | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
58 | HONG Vincent Q. | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
59 | ALTIRS Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.