Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 2 | DAVIS Jessica L. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% |
| 3 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 41% |
| 3 | PRIHODKO Nina | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 5 | BEI Karen | - | - | - | - | 7% | 38% | 54% |
| 6 | FENG ge | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 7 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
| 8 | POIRIER Ariane | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 9 | LUO Ashley | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 10 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 11 | SHU Youshan | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 12 | SONG Angela | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 13 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 19% |
| 14 | CHIEM Karen | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | YU Nicole J. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 16 | WONG Alexandra R. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 17 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 18 | CAFASSO Natalya | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 19 | SAAL Anna | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | WELLS Tessa (Tesla) M. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 24% | 3% |
| 21 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 24% |
| 22 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | LONADIER Keira | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 24 | AZMEH nour | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | CANNING Charlotte | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | SMITH Grace L. | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 50% | 16% |
| 27 | PAN Angela | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 28 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
| 29 | SMUK Daria A. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 30 | BO GENESIS | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 31 | HICKS Grace | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 32 | JENSEN MJ | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 39% | 13% | 1% |
| 34 | GUJJA Misha | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 35 | BENZAN India | - | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 36 | ZHENG Linden | 3% | 35% | 40% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | SMUK Alexandra S. | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 39 | SINHA Zara | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 40 | PORADA Yarena | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | HUANG Ziyan | 14% | 49% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 42 | ROWLAND May | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 43 | RICHARDSON Meredith | - | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 44 | SOTELO Michelle | 2% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | CAFASSO Sabrina | 17% | 43% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 47 | BYK Laura | - | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 48 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 5% | 39% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | CHENG Shu Yi | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 15% | 45% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | CHOY Ida | 1% | 9% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 52 | FENG Iris | 35% | 41% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | BYRON Karen J. | 1% | 19% | 46% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
| 54 | ZOU You Yang | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | NIELSON Norah | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | GORTI Ramya | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.